California and guns

SB 374 seems to refer only to the definition and requirements for registration of "assault weapons." None of that other stuff is in there. Nothing about magazines, ammo, insurance, etc., etc.

Seeker_4, the link you provided is to another site (and then another) where this rumor is being propagated. A link to the actual text of the bill, similar to the one in Tom Servo's post, would be helpful.
 
I read the article, watched the 22 minute film that shows the politicians talk. Elected to share. Since I'm not from CA it was of interest only, You have all the info I do. Perhaps it would be to my interest to dig deeper before sharing. If it offended anyone, or only rumor, I would too like to know. The film appeared very authentic such I chose to believe it and felt it was in fact news worthy to the forum. In the future I'll dig deeper before posting....
 
I do the only thing I'm able. I don't let my money go to gun unfriendly states, and most employment interviews are held at the gun range. ("bring your favorite weapon, I'll buy lunch.")
 
Run Hide Fight; city of Houston Texas...

The city of Houston Texas made a Homeland Security video/media clip called; Run Hide Fight. The funding & resources provided in part by the US DHS.
The production values are not bad & the basic concept(to get thru or survive a spree shooting/active shooter event) is valid. I take issue with a few points but its worth viewing.

The clip says to ignore or avoid wounded or injured victims because it delay your egress which is true but in a high stress event or where you have inter-personal relations with people or children(like a hospital, school, campus, office bldg) that would be difficult.
Run Hide Fight also says to aid any bystanders or people unaware of the event(s) from entering the area once you are safe.
This too would be hard. Injury, smoke, loud noise, gunshots, fire, emergency equipment lights, etc is very traumatic and a regular person not trained or conditioned may create stragglers or misinformation.

Many people will straight out flee & stampede out of the scene.

ClydeFrog
 
Each one of these is a separate bill . There were 10 to 15 introduced . Some are not even bills yet . They just have a place held for them like SB whatever .

•Banning the possession — not just manufacture and sale — of magazines holding more than 10 rounds.
•Making possession of hollow point bullets and similar “assault bullets” a felony.
•Requiring anyone wishing to buy ammunition to first get a permit by passing a background check.
•Requiring the registration and reporting of all ammo purchases. Limits the number of rounds anyone can have at one time to 500 rounds.
•Requiring all gun owners will have to be licensed like drivers, and will be forced to carry gun liability insurance.
•Banning any gun that has a detachable magazine, and requires a 100% prohibition of all fixed magazines greater than 10 rounds.
•Making all previous grandfathered magazines become illegal, and it will become a felony if you keep one.
•Prohibiting anyone barred from owning a weapon from living in a home where weapons are kept
•Expanding the list of crimes that would bar a person from gun possession.
•Letting the state Justice Department use money from the state’s Dealer’s Record of Sale system to eliminate the backlog of people identified as no longer allowed to own guns but not yet investigated and contacted by law enforcement.
Click to expand...

I believe this link Will give you each bill and what it possesses .

http://www.firearmspolicy.org/the-issues/california/2013-2014/

EDIT : Holy cow I just looked at the link I gave :eek: They added some stuff .there was not that many last time I looked :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top