Bush Administration Prevents Another Terror Attack on U.S. Soil

Fremmer

New member
According to the LA Times:

NEW YORK — Federal investigators on Saturday said they had disrupted a plot by Islamic extremists to blow up buildings, fuel tanks and pipelines at John F. Kennedy International Airport, another alleged plan aiming at America's air travel system and a landmark in its largest city.

The men had gathered detailed surveillance of the airport, made repeated overseas trips and sought help from a radical Islamic organization in Trinidad, said federal officials, citing an investigation underway since January 2006.

"The devastation that would be caused had this plot succeeded is unthinkable," said U.S. Atty. Roslynn R. Mauskopf, who represents the Eastern District of New York, at a Saturday afternoon news conference in Manhattan to announce the arrests.

The complaint says Defreitas had greeted the informant and a companion at a mall, saying he recognized them from a Brooklyn mosque. Defreitas and the informant met on occasions after that, and eventually Defreitas invited him into the plot, the complaint says.

The two are described as making four visits to JFK together in January to conduct surveillance and make videotapes of potential targets. The two also traveled to Guyana together, the complaint says.

* * * *

President Bush, as well as the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, deserve credit for continuing to protect the citizens of the United States from terror attacks here at home. The damage caused by the planned attack would have been severe.

The Administration should be recognized and complimented for the outstanding work that has been accomplished in aggressively investigating and protecting us from terror attacks here in the United States.
 
"The devastation that would be caused had this plot succeeded is unthinkable," said U.S. Atty. Roslynn R. Mauskopf, who represents the Eastern District of New York, at a Saturday afternoon news conference in Manhattan to announce the arrests.

Wasn't this part of the story debunked? As in physically impossible as jet fuel isn't exactly a wick? (now the fumes on the other hand . . .)

So, the question becomes: Was this part of an organized attack, or simply some guys doing this on their own? You would think that if was organized, it would have some possibility of succeeding.
 
I do alot of work with the DHS and they are just another typical gov't agency. Bush can't personally take credit for the capture of the JKF airport terrorists.

IIRC the Dept of HS recently released data that show that only .01% of all investigated cases by the dept actually were terrorist related. That's NOT a good track record to be proud of, and Pres Bush should not be proud of their efforts.
 
Dhs

Pres Bush should not be proud of their efforts.

I also work quite abit with many various DHS Departments (i.e., CBP, USCG, FBI)... and they can and do link their effectiveness to this administration. Maybe we can put Clinton back in he so he/she can find Osama and let him go again. Or better yet help put our Armed Forces back to the 1992-2000 funding levels. Yea -- that's what we need. Our President hasn't done anything. RIGHT!
 
On a serious note, fighting them over there won't stop home grown plots that spring from the general culture of evolving Jihadism in the USA.

Neither Bush nor Clinton can claim any particular competence in fighting terror. Only zealots for each, devoid of rational thought, can think either has been any good at it. It is sad when the defense for your guy being crappy is that the guy from the other party is equally crappy or crappier.
 
I think that this latest foiled attack is just another example of how well the Administration has protected us from terrorists, and a prime example of why we have not suffered another terrorist attack since Sept. 11, 2001.

And President Bush does deserve credit for this: he is the head of the executive branch of government, and he is responsible for leading agencies such as the FBI, CIA, and Department of Homeland Security in a way to prevent these attacks.

You may not like him, but ya gotta admit that the Bush Administration has prevented terrorists from attacking us here at home.
 
The same logic makes him culpable for the 9/11 attacks. As the guy in charge, having seen that famous warning brief and having the FBI and CIA under his leadership bobble the 9/11 warning clues (flight training) - you would have to conclude the attacks happened because of his failure to prevent them.

The Fort Dix attack was prevented by a video store clerk, BTW. Certainly, the most famous post 9/11 attack - the Anthrax incident - was never solved - was that his fault. Your logic would suggest so.

Is the failure to capture Osama indicative of his leadership in the struggle?

Under most presidents, the good people in various agencies would have tried to prevent more attacks. Bush provided little actual strategy for them.

You can't prove a negative and I don't think we have stopped a 9/11 level attack since then that has been definitely documented to have been to that stage. Even the airline attacks with liquids was not really into the action stage.
 
President Deserves Credit

how well the Administration has protected us from terrorists

Comes down to priorities. We could have put Al Gore in there to create a better internet than the first one or help save a few more trees. Or President Clinton who was busy doing "stuff" other than running the country quite a bit. BTW: If you want to lay blame for 911 lets start with Clinton and Carter before him. Their priorties were not defense and security.

I disagree with many of our Presidents Policy -- foremost imigration. But, he has put funding were needed. Look at President Clintons funding level for the Military as well as his disgust. As a former PSYOP/1st Cav Soldier and US Citizen I support our President 100%.
 
Bush provided little actual strategy for them.

Really? I thought that President Bush proposed and implemented (after congressional authorization) the Department of Homeland Security. Sounds like a strategy to me. A successful strategy that has prevented terrorist attacks here. I understand that authorities typically arrest terrorists before the attacks are carried out, and I appreciate the pre-emptive action to prevent death, destruction, and terror before the attack occurs. Would you prefer that the authorities wait to make the arrests until after a terrorist attack occurs?
 
Yeah.. glad for that. Now if we could just get those gay translators back to interpret the massive raw data coming out of the middle east we'll be back further. (As that came up in the repub debate and not one candidate raised their hand.) (plus it was YOU'RE segue ;))
 
Dhs

No sir. The DHS was not proposed by the Bush administration. It was thrust upon them.

I think you need to do a little more homework. What was "thrust" upon this Adminstration was a "quick" fix to an old problem -- how do we get Federal LEOs to share information and work together better and do it NOW! This Administration is responsible for the Department of Homeland Security. It is an EXECUTIVE BRANCH agency (not Judicial, not Legislative) and it was created by the current Executive Branch in Office.

Do I think this Administration would have liked a little more time to better prepare a strategy -- YES -- did they create DHS by merging 26 or so other Agencies into DHS YES.

BTW: I work for the Executive Branch (one of the non DHS Agencies) and they will tell all tell you the same thing... DHS was formed by the Bush Administration no matter how you spin it.
 
Yeah.. glad for that. Now if we could just get those gay translators back to interpret the massive raw data coming out of the middle east we'll be back further. (As that came up in the repub debate and not one candidate raised their hand.) (plus it was YOU'RE segue )
Didn't good ole Ron have something to say about that? I saw the DS clip last night too but I'm pretty sure I read an article that said he spoke up. :p
 
Here's my homework. Where's yours?


DHS was formed by the Bush Administration no matter how you spin it.
Who's spinning anything.. I know the bush administration signed it into existence, just that it was something they resisted.
 
Whatever became of that motley crew they picked up in Florida last year? They made them out to be a bunch of ninjas but it turned out they were more like Martha Stewart.
 
Time Magazine

Here's my homework. Where's yours?

Oh... Time Magazine it must be true.

On November 25, 2002, President George W. Bush signed as law the Homeland Security Act, the largest government re-organization since the creation of the Department of Defense (DoD) in 1947.
 
They are already here

If they had sealed the borders along time ago, even before 9-11 we would not have to worry about terrorists or illegals.

Only traitors leave the gates open for the raiders.
If tyranny and oppression come, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison.
 
Back
Top