Now THIS is what the BATFE should be doing every day in as many cities as possible.
Or the government could legalize drugs, reduce the perceived need for drug dealers and associates to have guns to protect their trade (since the laws won't), and this becomes a non-event.
I'm not impressed. Maybe a few of those 64 alleged suspects represent a genuine threat to society. Maybe they don't. Maybe some of them just wanted some recreational drugs. What's almost certain is that the government has now destroyed some families, while the truly dangerous (if any) among the suspects may be able to manage to plead to lesser charges and only get a few years.
I don't see, in the few brief articles about this, any mention of whether any of these 64 individuals are being charged with a violent crime, or conspiracy to commit a violent crime.
With the justice system in its current state, I'm almost in favor of leaving ostensibly non-violent criminals out of prison if they're going to get less than 10-20 years, since you can bet once these people have a few years in a federal prison, they will emerge with little to no hope of reintegrating with society, and a lot more knowledge of criminal enterprise, courtesy of their fellow inmates.
I don't care one bit about the drugs. It's the guns in connection with the drug operation that concerns me. However, a few hundred rounds for 70 guns indicates that most of those guns were not in a state to be used when they were confiscated. As for "getting guns off the street", demand for guns by violent criminals is inelastic. This is going to accomplish next to nothing. Violent criminals are going to get their guns, but somewhere else, if in fact any of these 64 people were supplying guns directly to violent criminal actors to begin with.
Now I'm sure someone will or could trot out the canard that maybe this will reduce Cleveland-area criminal homicides by a few people. Of course I'm all for reducing homicides, but there are some problems that overshadow a possible reduction. First, a theory like that is utterly unprovable to any reasonable certainty; even if homicides go down this year and next, the connection is unprovable. Second, you can also reduce criminal homicides by violating the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments. Reducing criminal homicides always sounds good, but if the means is criminalization of various inaninmate objects and substances, to wit drugs and guns, that are somewhat removed from any identifiable instance of major
malum in se crime, then I'm sorry, but I'm not in favor. And if there is a clear nexus with violent criminal enterprise, that's what these people should have been arrested for.
The drugs? Pure luck back in June netted Cleveland OH police more drugs than this year-long BATFE investigation.
http://www.fox8.com/news/wjw-cleveland-police-drug-bust-i-77-txt,0,2265331.story
Similarly, the criminal element would not have a very hard time replacing ~70 black market guns.
So, not impressed.