Now you say that bear attacks have gone up dramatically in the last 30 years. Dramatically? Really?
Okay, convince me. What data are you basing these claims on?
You have yet to produce any data to support your claim that attacks are dramatically on the rise. You do present some incidents and there are incidents every year, no doubt.
The wiki list of fatal bear attacks is interesting, but bizarre. Certainly many of the "attacks" noted are not unprovoked. Three of the bears were pets or animals normally kept caged. Some of the people were simple found dead, having been ravaged by bears but whether they were killed by bears or died of other causes is unknown. People certainly die while out hiking in remote areas. Hunters die every year while hunting, due to heart attacks.
Where is the dramatic increase?
I reject the premise you present.
What premise do you reject?
I believe in clean camp,leaving bears alone,avoiding cubs,backing away,staying out of berry patches,etc.Peace and love,bears!!
I also believe in having the means to slap one down.
Good for you. I see no problem with that.
Have you ever been close enough to touch a bear that had hurt someone in your family?
Nope, but I have been close enough to touch a bear myself while working survey in SE Alaska. We had lots of encounters with bears, but no attacks. And what is the relevance of being close enough to a bear to touch that has bitten a family member? I mean I know folks who have been in automotive crashes, but that doesn't make them automotive engineers.
You ask for sources,etc,what is your expertise?
Yes, I asked for sources. Alaska444 is both claiming that the data available are invalid because they are incomplete and claiming that bear attacks are dramatically on the rise. To state that they are "dramatically on the rise" would require the use of data that Alaska444 has already called into question. He is playing both sides of the data issue saying that it is invalid to support a view contrary to his own and at the same time claiming it supports his view.
Interestingly, he switches between data types, attacks and supposed kills by bears (most, but not all are definitely kills by bears). Apparently, Alaska444's only data compilation is Wikipedia that that only includes the supposed kills, and not the attacks. He says the attacks are dramatically on the rise in the last 30 years, so he must have some sort of comprehensive listing support the claim, wouldn't you think? Yet all he produces is the Wiki supposed kills and some isolated incidents. There is no way to discertn from the information provided that there is any sort of dramatic increase. And in some sort of odd reasoning, he presents some more wiki data about dog attacks as if dog attacks have any relationship to whether or not there is a dramatic increase in bear attacks.
Not only is there the issue with the data but the issue with the interpretations that all lean to the sensationalized end of the spectrum, such as how everyone would have been dead had they not all fought with everything they had. It is stated as a fact when it is speculation and there isn't data that support the speculation.
I liked this one as well.
Lastly, this man, Fortune is quite lucky in that he had four adult or semi-adult bears attacking him for whatever reason they followed him.
Now the story is that Fortune was followed by the bears? Where is there any evidence of him being followed. The guy was in his tree stand when the bears emerged from the woods nearby and sensed him. What following? So now the description has shifted from an encounter with Fortune being attacked to some sort of hunting event where Fortune was being followed by the bears. Given that Fortune was unaware that the noises he heard near his stand were those of bears, his only knowledge about the bears' behavior was once they were already very close to him. He had no knowledge of where they came from and no knowledge of being followed. Once again, this is a bias being interjected to make the story more sensational.
I have had squirrels and raccoons try to get in a tree stand with me while hunting, but I would be hard pressed to claim that they had followed me to the stand. I have had deer bed down under my stand, but I don't think they followed me either. I have had animals come down the same trail behind me, but I really could not argue that they followed me.