I think Henry P. may have hit on something. The S&W agreement smelled from the very beginning. One of my favorite parts that no one has mentioned is the section that deals with shipping. There have been standards for the strength of cardboard boxes for decades now. Measuring the strength of a box has become a science. So what does the S&W agreement say? All firearms will be shipped in "very strong boxes," or something feble-minded like that. Come on, as Slick Willie has shown us, "it all depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." All that it would take to violate this agreement is for you to ship a gun in a box that I didn't think was strong enough, and since there is no standard, who's to say. Well, combine the general smell of the agreement with a statement that the ex-pres. of S&W made on a tv documentary about not caring what the company made because his responsibility was to the shareholders. If you're looking to retool your entire firm and don't have the money to do it, what can you do? What can you do? Anybody remember Chrysler from a few years back? How about leading your company to the edge of collapse and then getting a huge government hand out to start over again? If S&W does everything the government asks and then still can't make money, doesn't it only seem fair that the government step in to help out? I really think that was the plan all along, I just couldn't see it until now. Anybody else? Regards Steve