I shoot a Remington 788 and with 150 GR. Remington Core Lokt bullets and it shoots 1/2 inch groups at 100 yrds. But just want to reload because I would like to do a lot more shooting on the range but want to stick with hunting loads. Looking for the best powder match up for 308 and noticed those powders in the Hornady Manual so scoping those out CFE 233, BL-C (2), and IMR 4064 would like to go with the best of the three.
Back in the day they were all hunting powders (grin). Still are.
Get the temp sensitivity thing out of your brain.
I will note the caveat, but for hunting purposes, its a non issue. Accuracy wise, under 400 yards, 1.5 inches is more than good enough for dear. Keep in mind, its not a bench shot (supported if possible l). You are not going for the X spot (yet to see a critter with an X on it) but the lungs and hopefully heart (quick kill)
Caveat: If you load up a really hot load when the temperature is very cool (40) of even cold (20) then if you shoot that load at 80 degrees, you may show pressure signs. It won't blow up the gun, you might get a sticky bolt.
Reality is, you are best loading to something above mid point but below maximum. Somewhere in there is the best accuracy and you are still in good shape regardless of temperatures. Dead on at 200 yards covers the situation pretty well.
If you want to experiment, BLC2 is fine, you don't have to, the two powders you have are plenty good.
I do experiment a lot but I am a pure bench rest shooter these days and I am after those tiny groups.
When I was hunting, my rifle was good for 1.5 inches. The only shot I missed was one I did not trust my ballistics and over compensated.
Two were at 250 yards, maybe a bit shorter on the one and pushing 300 on the other.
Both were solid lung shots, both went 20 feet and dropped.
note: Both were rested shots, one over a hood (yea I took liberties on that one) - the other was a kneeling braced shot.
always try to have a supported shot, that can make a huge difference. I would have taken off hand shots if I had to, I didn't have to and did not.
Bullet choices, distance and velocity are issues that should be explored for the best possible outcome at the ranges you shoot and the type of animal.
Mississippi listed a couple, that is the data you want to explore and is far more relevant than temperature sensitivity