well, there are some back-asswards areas where blue laws legislating against fornication and adultery are still on the books"having sex while here illegaly" in our criminal code.
well, there are some back-asswards areas where blue laws legislating against fornication and adultery are still on the books"having sex while here illegaly" in our criminal code.
Really? I wasn't aware there were provisions for "driving while here illegaly" (note: not the same as "driving without a license") or "eating a ham sandwich while here illegaly" or "having sex while here illegaly" in our criminal code.
No, that sounds idiotic and more than a bit childish. "But Mexico isn't nice to their immigrants!!!1!1!"
Give me a break.
Amazingly, all four (including the first one regarding getting to Mexico) relate to citizenship by immigration, not natural birth.
well, there are some back-asswards areas where blue laws legislating against fornication and adultery are still on the books
O k n i c e a n d slooooowwww, if they are here illegally everything they do is illegal. Of course there is no "driving while illegal alien" it's called driving without a license which is illegal, if they used forged documents to get a license they have committed two crimes; besides crossing illegal. I typed that very slow so as not to confuse you.
What about "eating a ham sandwich while illegal?"
Also, could you provide a link to the relevant statutes that make it clear that all actions taken by an illegal alien are illegal? Or is this just your opinion? If you can, I may actually admit that I'm wrong...who knows!
But until you do, you may want to not talk to me like a child...I'm not the intellectual midget who made a pisspoor analogy and is now desperate to defend it by insulting the person who pointed that out.
I'll admit I'm not a 100% correct and call a truce if you agree also. Then we can fix gun control
Fair enough...I'll agree that you're not 100% correct.
Kidding, of course...I've been wrong more than enough times to know that claiming to be 100% correct is a sure way to look foolish later.
But at least it wasn't a car analogy. I really hate car analogies.
And who pays for these never immigrating anchor babies"Anchor babies" are never immigrating, thus they aren't jumping in line in front of anybody. And citizens can have just as many children as they like, without having to pay any charge for citizenship on each one. So no, citizenship by birth is not a scarce resource.
And who pays for these never immigrating anchor babies
Who pays the birth bills, the school bills ($7000 per year), their PD when they get into trouble, their childhood diseases and inoculations?
The tax revenue system, which they generally don't contribute to, does.
That's the national average, got it from a 20/20 report on why American schools suckI agree Joab...$7000.00 per year for school bills is a bit over the top.
That would almost be a good rebuttal if I had even implied anything about incarcerating anybodybetter we spend incarcerating the 12 million miscreants for $35000.00+ per head, and send the message home to Americans that we mean businesss.
Which would explain why I also advocate massive welfare reform in this countryI'm failing to see how this is any different from babies/children born to low-income citizens, who generally have all the same issues and whose parents generally contribute about as much to the tax revenue system.
And if we stopped giving welfare wenches a raise every time the dropped another one we would see a reductionI also suspect that if simply having a baby here wouldn't be effective at keeping the parent(s) here (which my suggestion would achieve), we'd probably have less such babies anyway...but I could be wrong.