binoculars

NHSHOOTER

New member
Just returned from a hunt down south where they tend to stay late in the blinds, it was suggested that I get a decent pair of binoculars and I totally agreed, I had a small compact pair that would fit in your pocket, not sufficient at all. I would like suggestions on brands, magnification and of course prices. Just went on ebay and of course they all just jump right out at ya, I am not in a hurry so I will do my homework and shop..
I know I will get plenty of good suggestions here on TFL and I want to thank you all ahead of time.
 
Whats your budget, I have a pair of swarvoski that are amazing, for hunting I use Nikon Monarchs, they are really really nice... I also have a pair of explore 10x50s that were very affordable and perform way beyond their cost...
explore optics, nikon, leupold, go to optics planet and look for sales, they have plenty out there


I have these, about the best hunting bi optics I have ever used http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-7548-Wa...&qid=1417649095&sr=8-5&keywords=nikon+monarch they are worth every penny...
 
Last edited:
Hand held binoculars used for detailed views are best at 7 power for most people. Image stability gets worse at higher power as does image brightness dim for a given objective lens size. A waterproof lightweight 7x35 is a good choice and makes acceptable compromises for most people. Compare several for image quality in dim light then pick the one you like. If you wear glasses, some binoculars have wider field of views seen with glasses on.
 
Last edited:
A 6X or 7X is a good place to start. The most important thing in low light is to buy glass with an objective size at least 5X greater than the magnification. A 6X30, 7X35, 8X40 or 10X50 will work much better in low light than 8X22 and 10X25 binoculars that are so common. And buy quality. Good glass trumps bigger size. There are some good quality 8X32's that will work better than a cheap set of 8X40's

I find 8X40's to be bigger than I really want to carry most of the time. I currently have a couple in 6X32 and 6.5X36 that get carried a lot. If you want to keep them fairly compact then the magnification needs to be kept down. A set of 10X50's are huge and better suited for use in a vehicle.

The problem is that there aren't a lot of good options in a 6X or 7X. Lots of good 8X40's out there at good prices.
 
Jmr40's factor for objective lens size in mm's is new to me, but I totally agree. A good rule of thumb

My wife won a pair of Alpen binoculars in a drawing. That Apex series 10x42 Mossy is as bright and razor sharp as my 40-year-old Canon 7x50's. They've got 8x42's in the same Apex line that should be a better one for field use. Plus a tripod adapter's available to mount them solidly.
 
Last edited:
Ive got a pair of leupy 8X42 cascades that I love...compared them to the nikon monarch 8xs and to my eyes they were better..
 
I use my Kahles 8x32 binocular for bow and shotgun deer hunting in Iowa - current price is about $900. I use my Swarovski SLC 10x42 binocular for western hunting - current price is about $1,800. Both are superb and I feel the Kahles is a very good value.
 
nhs,

I bought a pair of Nikon ATB binocs for about $230 three years ago. Within the first year all the rubber "armor coat" peeled off. I mailed it back to Nikon at my expense and they told me their "warranty" only covered the optics so I would have to pay for the repair and return shipping.

I paid the fees and they sent me a new pair of ATB binocs. Only problem was that the the right objective lens had some sort of liquid smears inside making the right side vision blurry. With the bad taste of their last "warranty" service I just use it as is and did not return it a second time.

So no more Nikons for me. I do have a number of Leupold scopes and have been very pleased with them but no Leupold binocs. Good luck.

best wishes- oldandslow
 
I started out with a pair of hand-me-down Empire 7x50s my dad bought for my mom to use when hunting with him. They worked okay, but eventually one of the eye pieces broke, and I had been complaining about them fogging the last few years.

So as a Christmas gift a few years ago, Dad upgraded me to some Nikon Monarch X 10.5x45s. They are really, really nice. I think Nikon dropped the X line of the Monarchs, but I'd still recommend the Monarch line.
 
If you haven't tried somebody's image stabilized ones yet give 'em a whirl. Its probably the single biggest development in binoculars in the last 100 years.

If you want low light ability look at 7X50, 8X 40 or 8.5X44.

Don't ignore "store brands" either. One of the biggest marketing ploys nowadays is re-branding. What that means is that high end manufacturer/importer "A" buys binoculars from a mass maker who is unknown & sticks a high end brand name label on it, & charges appropriately. Then a mass market retail chain buys the same binocular from the same "Peoples Factory #153" but sells it for a lower price.;)
 
Had some 7x35 binocs for years, but went to 10x40's and much prefer them. Get the highest power you can hold without a lot of wobble and shake. For most folks, that's 10 power. And, in a reverse 'size matters' manner, small is better when it comes to binocs, as is light weight. For years I searched for just the right binocs. Found some Leica 10x40's and paid the money (which hurt). The only thing that might pry those Leica binocs out of my hands might be some new Leica binocs/RF, but that's $3k, and I just don't need them that badly.

Seems there's constant chatter on what's the best binocs for the least money. That is a worthwhile objective, but the truth is that the best aren't cheap, if you want the best.
 
Whatever magnification you decide on, compare the porro prism and roof prism type binos. The roof prism type will be a little more compact.

Another consideration is weight. Moving up from a compact bino means moving up in weight also. You may not mind your binos hanging around your neck if just sitting in a blind, but the minute you have to start hiking you will. They will start swinging like a pendulum. There are nice harnesses available to arrest any movement of your binos. I recommend a harness.

Another consideration is eye relief, especially if you wear corrective lenses. The binos you select should have adjustable eyecups to adjust eye relief to suit your eyes.

Here is a primer on binocular selection:

Binocular Basics
 
Last edited:
Unless they are "image stabilized," they are just old fashioned junk.

Kind of like going from a slide rule to and HP-35.
 
The "image stabilization" issue is a "software issue", unless you are trying to use the binos in a moving vehichle.

If you can learn to hold a rifle with a 10X telescope atop it steady in field positions, you can hold a pair of binocs steady in the same conditions: the principles are the same. Learn to do it, and practice regularly.

In fact, because the binocs are small and compact, and not held out away from the body in use, they are easier to steady than a rifle .....

Those who advocate buying expensive "Image Stabilizing" have bought into the belief that you can spend enough money to be successful in the field, skillset be damned .......

Give your wallet a rest and invest in yourself: take the time to learn how to DO somesthing. Any idiot, in this age of fiat currency, can amass and plunk down a pile of cash for a gadget that will, on a good day, substitute for a skill that he should have learned ..... it will be harder to learn the skill, and certainly take more time ..... and the skill won't have a flashy logo on it ..... but it'll work so long as you do, and does not require batteries, a warranty, or customer service of any kind! You don't even need a teacher/instructor/mentor: You have the internet, and there are doubtless may instructional videos to be found ..... hie thee hence!

As to the OP's original question: my recommendation?

There is so much good glass out there, compared to the cheap stuff ..... I use a pair of older Leupold Wind River 10x50's ..... they've seen more than a decade of hard use .... the porro prism style, being heavier, has kind of gone out of style ...... The price has gone down on good optics, as well ..... I think I paid over a couple hundred dollars for mine ..... there are now roof prism (lighter) designs that are probably everybit as good as mine, probably better, made by the same company ....
 
They kicked and screamed at "horseless carriages" as well.

Regardless how still a binocular can be held, image stabilization improves the view.

The largest manufactures, Canon, has models that compare in price to Leopold, and MUCH less than Swarovski or Zeiss.

12x36isii_cl1_186x279.gif


http://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-12-x-36-IS-II-Image-Stabilized-Binoculars-/321583755386?pt=Binocular&hash=item4adfe2b07a
 
Hard to go wrong with Nikon Monarchs as a great pair of hunting binos.

Love mine and use them often especially out west.
 
I would like suggestions on brands, magnification and of course prices.

I've used lots of binos over the past four decades. These will do exactly what you're seeking:

https://www.google.com/search?q=can...&channel=nts&tbm=shop&spd=1773239182986239727

The stabilization makes a tremendous difference and allows the 10x magnification to really work for you. Extremely sharp images and compact enough to be practical for your purpose.

Shop around for the best price, because it varies a lot.
 
Perhaps a slightly different take.
Image stabilization is great for removing things like muscle tremors & heartbeats from high power binoculars. But there is another side to the OP's post he specifically wanted superior low light performance.
they tend to stay late in the blinds, it was suggested that I get a decent pair of binoculars and I totally agreed, I had a small compact pair that would fit in your pocket, not sufficient at all.
Because of the fact that there is a fixed relationship between magnification & objective lens size that works against low light performance lets not go to high power lenses with small objectives just to get image stabilization.
 
Back
Top