Big Foot Found in Georgia. No Really!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I could not believe you guys were so skeptical, so I asked my next door neighbor (notice my sign in ) about this, and he told me that the reason no one has found one yet, is because most people are looking for footprints on the ground. He says they actually live high in the tree tops, and travel by jumping from one tree top to another. His explanation of this dead one is, that he missed the tree he was jumping to.:eek:

Now how much more proof do you need?
 
I like the fact that there's only one picture of the "body" in the article. Every photo is either a crop and/or enlargement of the main picture.

I guess they only took one picture because film for digital cameras is so expensive. Or maybe because they didn't think there would be enough interest to warrant more than one photo.
Click to expand...


Come on now, this is Georgia, clearly they do NOT have digital cameras! This organization has been down trodden and vilified through out their existence. THAT is why there is only one bad picture- they were out of money, saving the last exposure from their last roll of film in the only camera they hadn't sold to stay in operation. My how it paid off! The scoffers will be sorry now!:D
Geesh:rolleyes::D
 
Well, I guess if Arnie can be Governor, Bigfoot can be President ;)

IF it's a hoax, we'll know soon enough. If it's NOT a hoax, they better hope that no bullet holes are found in the body.
 
Wait a minute now... Are ya'll sure it isn't one of those dancin GEICO Cave-Men dudes? I mean, I cain't be the only one that's gettin fed up with seein 'em on my TV on a regular basis. Maybe somebody just got tired and snuffed one out.
 
If this were true... I don't care who you are... You would present it asap for 2 reasons.
Get it out before rot ruins it too much more...
Get it out before a second find could beat you to it...
The second one won't mean much compared to the first one presented and these money grubbers would surely see this potential.
Brent
 
10's of millions of hunters annually- none have been shot

Millions of photographers -- no conclusive photos

10's of thousands of trail cams -- no conclusive photos

Billions of miles driven -- none hit by a car

1000's of "researchers" whose life mission is to find one -- none found



Why don't I believe? Hm.
 
Fine, don't believe in Bigfoot. But will you be so confident he doesn't exist when he's ripping your arms out of their sockets?
Click to expand...

Yes, I will lose my confidence every time an imaginary creature pulls me apart or space aliens take me into their space ship and "probe" me. Of course, I always take my chupacabras with me when I go into the woods.

There is no law I know of (in Georgia) to protect Bigfoot.
Click to expand...

Right. Few states have laws protecting imaginary animals.

In the 1980s, the states of Vermont and New York passed resolutions making it illegal to harm or molest in any way Champ. In 1973, the Arkansas state Senate passed a resolution declaring portions of the White River a protected refuge for the fabled water monster Whitey. And in 1969, Washington's Skamania County Board of Commissioners passed an ordinance setting out a $10,000 fine and five years in prison for anyone who killed a Bigfoot in the county.

Several states have considered such protections, but like Nevada and their Alien Highway, it appears to be tourism-based more than environmentalism-based.
 
Darn! I had already composed a long, flowery apology to post for being overly cynical...

I know, I'll save it for when the world actually DOES end in 2012. Hmmm... Guess that won't work either. :confused:
 
From the pics that are available it would seem that the poor fellow had to much of them their "Jack Links Jerky". Probably could not get to any water in time and died of jerky rehydration syndrome.
 
Saw it.

Biscardi promised proof. What was given was crap. There were 3 photographs and the results of 3 DNA tests. The photos were the one we have all seen, a closeup of the head supposedly proving it isn't a mask, and one of a live Bigfoot walking in the woods. The first image stands as dubious. The second didn't substantiate anything and certainly that it wasn't a mask. The third was supposed to be clear, but it was supposedly of the back of a Bigfoot walking away and you can't see squat(ch).

The DNA results were...
1 inconclusive
2 human
3 opossum

So the only primate DNA was human. This means that the DNA didn't prove crap either.

Biscardi supposedly has the carcass in a safe house but doesn't have any photographs of his own and he can't get more out of "the boys." Strange.

He is going to have some "Russians" look at the remains and is inviting Richard Klein, a Stanford paleontologist. I have no idea about the "Russians" but Klein is an actual scholar, but Klein is on holiday and hasn't responded to the invitation.

The claim was made repeatedly that they had the real thing, the body, the carcass, but no such proof was offered.

Even if they had some DNA results, without the actual carcass for context, who is to say what the DNA is from?

I find it really interesting that Whitton and his buddy drug out a 550 lb carcass from the woods, given that Whitton has only one useful hand.

Also see...
http://ghosttheory.com/?cat=5
http://ghosttheory.com/?p=131
http://ghosttheory.com/?p=138
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top