Bartholomew Roberts
Moderator
Removing the magazine disconnect serves to modernize the BHP, helping to bring it up to the standards set by modern police weaponry like the Glock 17, the Beretta M92, etc.
Hank, please don't get me wrong; I 100% support leaving the disconnect in or out as a personal choice by the user to suit his/her needs. I also don't believe you should live your life in fear of litigation, especially unlikely litigation such as this. I do think that the argument above would get ripped apart by a knowledgable lawyer in court, though.
If I were the lawyer pushing the civil suit against you and that was your defense, I would point out that FN modernized the gun around 1982 for the Army M9 competition and again in 1988. In both cases, FN engineers made significant changes to the gun to modernize it but decided to leave the mag disconnect intact. I'd then press you on whether you are more qualified than FN engineers to "modernize" your gun. If Bryco loses the Smith vs. Bryco case that is pending, that will be a case that will bode very poorly for removing already installed disconnects.
Having said that, I'm sure there are good arguments in favor of removing the disconnect that are easier to defend.
One would obviously be that the more consistent trigger pull favors accuracy and that the magazine safety is unneccessary in late-model Hi-Powers since they feature a cutout in the chamber that allows you to visually observe a round in the chamber.
Maybe we should argue the "case" here?