BHO Terrorist Apology Eight Days After 9/11

Ah, another page from the neo-con playbook: take your worst fault and accuse others of having it.
Click to expand...
Actually, I thought the best tactic was the preassigning the label of "Obama apologist" to anyone that found fault with the facts of the topic before they even spoke.
 
Since you asked I'll answer ...

How much LE and military experience do you have?
Click to expand...

I fail to see how the question is relevant to this discussion especial since you introduced a disparaging remark about those without military or LE experience. I'll give you a very small peek. A slice if you will, but just for your eyes only; Master's level, History of Warfare. And as you so astutely point out, the rest is a given.



you seem fond of the words ISLAMIC terrorist. You also call Obama in question with references to his past ISLAMIC connection. Do you have a problem with terrorists...or just Islamic ones? Do you have a problem with poetical positions, or just positions of politicians you perceive to have Islamic ties?
Click to expand...

Actually I do. I call a spade a spade, a terrorist a terrorist and an Islamic terrorist an Islamic terrorist. That sir, is what they are plain and simple.
 
I fail to see how the question is relevant to this discussion especial since you introduced a disparaging remark about those without military or LE experience. I'll give you a very small peek. A slice if you will, but just for your eyes only; Master's level, History of Warfare. And as you so astutely point out, the rest is a given.
Click to expand...
In other words you are saying.."No, I have not real experience."
Do you have a problem with terrorists...or just Islamic ones? Do you have a problem with political positions, or just positions of politicians you perceive to have Islamic ties?
Click to expand...
Actually I do
Click to expand...
Ah, so this is all about religious intolerance for you. You think some peopl eare just bad because they are the wrong religion.
 
and a sharper hook Buddy.
Click to expand...
Ah...I get it. When your argument has been exposed as base agenda driven propaganda it is best to try and appear to be taking the high road and play martyr. It is easier than trying to defend the falsehoods and misrepresentations of your actual case. Actually trying to debate the subject may make the peasants realize that the emperor has no clothes.
 
There is no ...

debate when one shouts with closed eyes and ears. Your doing your level best to bait a reaction to get this thread closed down and I will not accommodate you. I will ask a question though;

Would you have written this to your local newspaper editorial department eight days after 9/11 ...PBP?

BHO ...
"We must also engage, however, in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness. The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others. Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity. It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair."
 
debate when one shouts with closed eyes and ears. Your doing your level best to bait a reaction to get this thread closed down and I will not accommodate you. I will ask a question though;
Click to expand...
Garbage, your tactic of avoiding the actual topic is what will ge tthe thread closed. You presented an thread that was based either on gross misunderstanding or deliberate deception and then when you cannot defend your position you resort to distraction.
Would you have written this to your local newspaper editorial department eight days after 9/11 ...PBP?
Click to expand...
To say what?
"We must also engage, however, in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness. The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others. Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity. It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair."
Click to expand...
Translation: These people did bad things because they are bad people. They cannot blame their birth nation nor their heritage for the fact they are bad people. People are not born bad. It was their enviroment and their personal choices that made them bad. We need to try and find out what circumstances are creating such bad people and try to stop the cycle before it reaches the point of more lives being lost.

Yeah, real damaging stuff their. :rolleyes:
 
Would you PBP have ...

sent your translation of BHO words to your local newspaper's editorial department eight days after 9/11?

PBP ...Translation: These people did bad things because they are bad people. They cannot blame their birth nation nor their heritage for the fact they are bad people. People are not born bad. It was their environment and their personal choices that made them bad. We need to try and find out what circumstances are creating such bad people and try to stop the cycle before it reaches the point of more lives being lost.
Click to expand...
 
Absolutely. What is wrong with what he said? Nothing, that is what is wrong with it. It is compassionate, well reasoned, and tactically sound.

You are, as I have already said, either having trouble comprehending the meaning of his words or deliberately assigning false meaning to further a person agenda.
 
I know all I need to know about you.
Click to expand...
What is that? That I am able to understand when someone is saying something compassionate, considerate, tactically sound, and intellectually well thought out? regardless of how I feel about them as a candidate? That I do not let Rush and O'Reilly tell me what to think of someone?
 
I would argue that Socialism/Marxism is a religion too. A religion where the totalitarian Marxist leader plays God and almost always bans any other religion. Having been to Tibet, I can say that I have first-hand experience with the face of this evil religion and I want no part of it. There is a close similarity between the totalitarian part of the belief systems of radical Marxists and radical Islamists. I think that is why the far left is against fighting the terrorists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top