non +P I'd have to go with the wadcutters.
A HP will hinder penetration, for a slightly bigger hole. I'd rather have the slightly smaller hole, and ensure that it goes deep enough especially with the low velocity of a snubby and non +P ammo. It's going to be sending bullets at a low velocity. Ie. not good for penetration either. a SWC or full WC will ensure more than adequate penetration and a pretty nasty hole.
I have a sort of generalized rule that I follow. If the cartridge develops less than 200ft-lbs at the muzzle, I opt for a solid/non-expanding bullet, preferably with the biggest widest meplat available. The wadcutters ensure sufficient penetration with decent terminal performance. An expanding bullet could risk stopping too short in certain situations. A pass through is OK, IMO.
If you believe the 'energy dump' is what kills the BG, you're better off throwing punches, because most humans can punch with force more than common pistol cartridges can put out at the muzzle, in terms of raw energy.
A HP will hinder penetration, for a slightly bigger hole. I'd rather have the slightly smaller hole, and ensure that it goes deep enough especially with the low velocity of a snubby and non +P ammo. It's going to be sending bullets at a low velocity. Ie. not good for penetration either. a SWC or full WC will ensure more than adequate penetration and a pretty nasty hole.
I have a sort of generalized rule that I follow. If the cartridge develops less than 200ft-lbs at the muzzle, I opt for a solid/non-expanding bullet, preferably with the biggest widest meplat available. The wadcutters ensure sufficient penetration with decent terminal performance. An expanding bullet could risk stopping too short in certain situations. A pass through is OK, IMO.
If you believe the 'energy dump' is what kills the BG, you're better off throwing punches, because most humans can punch with force more than common pistol cartridges can put out at the muzzle, in terms of raw energy.
Last edited: