tackdriver
New member
You'd win that bet. I fondled the Taurus 709 yesterday and almost walked out with it, but I've found they're having a pretty consistent problem with light primer strikes and extractor failures. Hopefully that will be something Taurus addresses in production, but they're not as open with the process as KelTec is and thus folks have little confidence in them.Id take a bet you go CW9 over 709.
i was just in that boat with about 2 other guns included,and the CW9 made it further in my decision process over the 709.
Bah, back to square one.
The used airweights are just not plentiful, either. That was my fall-back. The price difference is about $40 before tax anyway, so what's the bargain? And, the darn second mag for the CW9 runs $40-$50, too.
So now the Taurus 856 and 651 are gaining steam.
:barf: My wife bought one, never shot it. I was also not a fan. Never has such a small gun felt and carried so big.Otherwise, a used Glock 26/27 would be good for such use
Whatever I get has to be able to be carried IWB. Pocket carry would be nice, but isn't a deal maker or deal breaker.I've got a 642 that is a cozy little carry piece, when an IWB holster and larger gun just isn't practical. There are a lot of different variants of the 642... conventional hammered, bobbed hammer, shrouded hammer, hammerless. Recoil is brisk, but certainly not unusable.
I favor a heavier gun though, unless I can't carry it in a OWB/IWB holster. What's your intended carry technique?