To add to what Scott has said about Blade-tech, my holsters are a bit of a mixed bag. My right side IWB's workmanship is top notch. I can find no fault in it.
On the other hand, my left side IWB's workmanship seems shoddy. I mean, the molding isn't crisp and clear like the right one. Even worse, the holes for the retention screws are a full 1/8" of an inch off from where it should be. It's as if someone left it in the hands of a moderatedly experience amateur.
I'm sure there is a rational explanation for this. But since I know next to nothing about Blade-tech's manufacturing process, I can't say just what that would be. For all practical purposes, however, both works where it counts, and that's good enough for me.
Another note I would like to add. About a week or so ago, I went to the gun store nearby me and saw a man wearing wearing a Glock with a Mad Dog holster. A brief conversation with him confirmed that it was. Upon close examination, I noticed that the inside of the trigger was exposed by a 1/4" gap! Enough to expose the space behind the trigger. This was quite alarming indeed. But, I didn't mention anything to him. I guess I should've, but he uh.. didn't seem very receptive somehow. Don't get me wrong, of course. My Mad Dog IWB is of excellent quality even if the fit is a bit tight.
Anyways, I am just re-emphasizing Scott's point about holsters being a mixed bag. Aside from minor characterstics that needs to be taken into consideration when selecting a holster, the overall quality of the holster is more important than what brand or who makes them.
$.02
[This message has been edited by SB (edited February 26, 1999).]