I know, it's one appeal I have for single shot pistols and rifles like the T/C's, but I don't have a need or desire to own 10 different barrels. The wildcats are cool and all, but I've not much interest in them unless they're based off some case that is easy to source at the range.TC Contender or Encore = all of the above.
But be warned, as you may have noticed by several of the previous posts, buying the easily changed barrels is habit forming!
My list:
22 LR 14" Match
22 Hornet
223 Remington
7-30 Waters
357 Magnum
357 Harrett
35 Remington
44 Magnum
45-70
I know, it's one appeal I have for single shot pistols and rifles like the T/C's, but I don't have a need or desire to own 10 different barrels. The wildcats are cool and all, but I've not much interest in them unless they're based off some case that is easy to source at the range.
It's one reason I've gravitated a lot to the .357 Maximum. It's got good power, maybe not big game stopping power, but enough for any situation I could possibly use it for.
1. I do have some .35 Remington brass my uncle game me, but it's not a cartridge that interests me. Along the lines of what others have said about pistol specific cases, the .35 Rem is probably not a case optimized for use in a 10-12 inch pistol barrel, plus it's not rimmed.1. Just say “no” to .357 Maximum. The recoil and blast are oppressive. Hot .357 Magnum is more than enough. If you want to make your Contender a nice Carbine, .35 Remington would do the same job with less stress.
2. Just say “no” to .454 Casull. You need all the weight you can get to help tame recoil. 45 Colt “Ruger and Contender only” loads will get all you need with less stress and no need for an Encore.
3. If you want a big boomer, 45-70 just because.
I think I would really like a .327 Fed Mag barrel... from plinking to white tail, at realistic ranges .. yeah. .32-20 “Contender only” would be a question of how much cooler do you want to be than your pals.
Realistically, a .357 magnum barrel is awesomely flexible and common.
Presumably you're going to a single-shot pistol for the accuracy potential. Shooting a shorter cartridge than the gun is chambered for is going to throw away some of that accuracy potential. I'm not saying it's definitely guaranteed to make the gun shoot poorly, but you're more likely to get good accuracy from a cartridge that fits the chamber and doesn't require the bullet make a jump to get to the rifling.2. I hear you on .454, I've long believed hot .45 Colt was good enough in a Ruger, I just mentioned it because it's safer to load a .45 Colt hot in a .454 chamber.
Presumably you're going to a single-shot pistol for the accuracy potential. Shooting a shorter cartridge than the gun is chambered for is going to throw away some of that accuracy potential.
and aftermarket barrels seem to only want to chamber .327 in a barrel with .308 groove diameters,
I think that's probably true. There are other accuracy issues inherent to revolvers that likely dominate.I don't think it matter much in revolvers...
When you get away from revolvers to a more conventional chamber/barrel/leade arrangement, I think the difference in accuracy potential due to the bullet jump becomes more significant because you've eliminated most of the accuracy issues inherent to revolvers.I've seen a few posts on forums the past couple months of people dumping revolvers for single shots for the accuracy and quality.
True, it's getting away from the goal, but if I wanted to shoot some lighter .454 rounds I would have to lower the charge to starting loads and that may leave too much air space in the case and cause other issues.I think that's probably true. There are other accuracy issues inherent to revolvers that likely dominate.
However, the OP specifically stated that he was interested in single shots for the improvement in accuracy over revolvers.When you get away from revolvers to a more conventional chamber/barrel/leade arrangement, I think the difference in accuracy potential due to the bullet jump becomes more significant because you've eliminated most of the accuracy issues inherent to revolvers.
I don't think it's going to be a huge effect, but it just seems inconsistent with the stated goal.
I'll see who else makes barrels for the Thomson Center pistols, currently I only know of Match Grade Machine and Bulberry.If you want something other than what they offer order it. Barrel makers will cut the tube to anything you want it just takes a bit of $$.
I shot 7/TCU for years, and it was an effective round in competition as far as accuracy and had lots of potential for other uses. It was very effective in a 10" or 14" barrel and not bad recoil.
So, what caliber(s) would be best for a single shot like the Thompson Center?
I wish T/C made a 10 to 12" .357 Encore barrel with iron sights.