Best 9mm Personal Defense Round

9 mm ammo

I like Corbon 115 gr DPX +P or 115 gr JHP +P. My understanding from experts is (1) not to use +P+ and (2) not to use anything larger than 124 gr. Corbon ammo may be too hot for older guns. There are many sites that
rate pistols in terms of ability to handle the hotter loads, which are fine for my CZ SP-01, but not for many lesser pistols. Corbon is not plinking ammo--too expensive. For the range and plinking, a clean-firing FMJ is best.
 
My understanding from experts is (1) not to use +P+ and (2) not to use anything larger than 124 gr.

The problem with +P+ ammo is the wide variances in how it's loaded. You see, a +P or +P+ rating does not refer directly to the velocity of a cartridge, but rather to the maximum chamber pressure. SAAMI (the organization which sets standards for U.S. made ammunition) has set maximum chamber pressures for nearly every common handgun cartridge (and it's European counterpart CIP has done so for most of the more obscure cartridges) and officially recognizes +P designations in .38 Special, 9mm, and .45 ACP and sets maximum pressure limits for these at 10% over maximum standard pressure. SAAMI, however, does not officially recognize the +P+ designation in any caliber, so the only thing it can be uniformly counted on to represent is that the cartridge in question may be loaded over maximum +P pressure, but you don't know how far over. Manufacturers like Winchester and Federal that make +P+ ammunition for law enforcement use typically keep the pressures at 10% or less over maximum +P, but smaller, less reputable manufacturers and those making ammunition for military use may load their ammunition to significantly higher pressure for use in submachineguns.

If you have +P+ ammunition from a well-known, reputable manufacturer who intended the ammo in question to be used in handguns, you're usually pretty safe so long as you only use it in a good quality gun of fairly recent manufacture and only in limited amounts. I personally use Winchester Ranger 127grn +P+ ammunition for carry in my CZ-75B, but I only shoot in in extremely limited amounts and only with an extra power recoil spring installed.

One other caveat to this is that .38 Special +P+ ammunition should really only be shot in .357 Magnum revolvers or extremely strong .38 Special revolvers such as a Ruger Security Six, GP100, or SP101 or a S&W N-Frame such as the old .38/44 Heavy Duty and Outdoorsman. .38 Special +P+ ammo was a way for many LE agencies to get better performance than what .38 or .38 +P could offer without using the politically-incorrect Magnum ammunition. Typically, these agencies would buy .357 Magnum revolvers like S&W M19's, Colt Troopers, or Ruger Security Sixes and load them with the .38 +P+ cartridges. The manufacturers of such ammunition made it only for law enforcement and did not market it to the civilian market for fear of it winding up in a gun not strong enough to handle it (such as what happened with the old .38/44 ammo before the .357 Magnum was introduced). These ammo-makers usually recommended that this ammo only be used in .357 revolvers. The most commonly encountered .38 +P+ ammo seems to be Federal 147grn +P+ Hydra-Shoks.

The recommendation against bullets heavier than 124grn comes mainly from older bullet designs. The 147grn loadings were developed in the late 1980's and early 1990's in response to the 115grn's perceived lack of penetration following the FBI's 1986 Miami Shootout and subsequent wound ballistics studies. While the early 147's did penetrate quite well, they couldn't be driven fast enough to achieve reliable expansion with the comparatively primitive JHP's available at the time and soon received a bad reputation. Advances in bullet design have improved both the penetration of the 115grn loadings as well as the expansion of the 147's. As a side note, 147grn loadings are often among the most accurate 9mm loadings because of their increased bearing surface.
 
Good 9mm hollowpoint loads:
124gr +P Speer Gold Dots
127gr +P+ Winchester Ranger-T (currently what I have loaded in my 9mms)
124gr +P Remington Golden Sabers
124gr +P+ Federal Hydrashok

I have a bias toward a 124 +P load, but would be happy with one of the 115gr +P or +P+ loadings available. Also good choices would be the 147gr Gold Dot and Golden Saber.

Basically, anything in a premium hollowpoint that gets placed where it needs to go will work.
 
I spent an hour or 2 checking out some vids on You tube that did side by side comparisons with a variety of different tests measuring mostly expansion, penetration, and weight retention of various 9mm rounds, mostly hollow points. The ones that really stood out in my mind after seeing a whole slew of vids were the Winchester Ranger T's (RA9T?), after that were the Gold Dots and then came the Federal Hydra-Shocks. Although I'm more of a .45 man myself, I'd trust my life to any one of those 9mm rounds. There were numerous other 9mm hollow points that were impressive as well but those 3 left the best impression on me. So far as their weights I believe they 3 I mentioned were all in the range of 124g-127g as I recall. Like others have said already. Any of todays modern technology hollow points are getting the job done nicely. I can't think of one of them that penetrated less than 11 inches. Most were in the 12-14 inch range of penetration. I currently have a box of Winchester Ranger Bonded (RA9B)hollow points that I'm sure will do the job nicely if required to do so.

So far as the heavier 147g stuff. It seems that if it goes too slow it doesn't expand well enough even though it penetrates deep enough. If it's velocity is increased too much the expansion seemed to be better but then it would be closer to the high end of accepted penetration depths. That's why it seemed to me that the stuff in the 124-127 range tended to be the better performing ammo.

In summary: What I keep my eyes peeled for are any of these in the 124-127 range.

-Winchester Rangers
-Gold Dots
-Hydra Shocks

Nothing wrong with the Federal HST stuff either. HST2 is my first choice here.

Roach
 
Last edited:
I love the Mag Tech 93 grain solid copper HP they sell the loaded and I think it is +p. I have hand loaded them and in my own testing (not a pro) I got 1500 fps and the bullet looked like the pedals of a flower nearly 100% wieght was retained. The thing that was really impressive when I took them home found they expanded to eighty one caliber!

I did not check but bet the factory load must hit aroung 1300-1500 fps.
 
As a side note, 147grn loadings are often among the most accurate 9mm loadings because of their increased bearing surface.

Perhaps this is why it is the most accurate in my gun. I have found the 147 grainers to be more accurate than the others by quite a bit.
 
I'm kind of torn between performance and accuracy, I often shoot at 50 yards and my carry guns can all hold 3-4 inch groups easily with the right ammo. I have a few I have used such as 124gr Gold Dots, Federal 115gr+p+, Federal 124gr+p+ hydra-shok, Win. 127gr +p+. The 115gr Federals are unreal accurate, but I am not that sold on the weight for deep penetration which I feel is essential as well as expansion. I did carry Ranger 127gr+p+ but ran out and haven't found any locally.

I realize most firefights are relatively close and most ammo is more than accurate enough. I guess this brings the decision down to performance and availability. I have done some research on Winchesters new line of personal protection bonded ammo, it looks good on paper and I've read the FBI has adopted it. My local wally world always has it so I have bought some. I now carry it in my CCW, but am still waiting to see real world performance. Federal HST also has a good track record and if I could get some locally I may give it a try.

I think its hard to go wrong with any of the HST, Winchester bonded LEO ammo or most Gold Dots.
 
The "best" ammo is a subjective question. Do you want best penetration, expansion, velocity, accuracy, et cetera? It also varies by gun.
I've gotten the best "overall" performance from the following:

Springfield XD9: Remington Golden Sabers.
Kahr CW9: Haven't really found a favorite.
Ruger LCP: Hornady Critical Defense.
S&W 442: Speer GDHP for SB.
Ruger Vaquero (.357): Hornady XTP.

I've been pretty happy with any Hornady ammo, that I've used in any gun. CorBon is always loaded pretty hot and has a bit more muzzle flash than others. Federal HydraShocks are okay but don't really impress me.
 
My sometimes finicky Taurus PT111 prefers Federal 115 gr. JHP (C9BP), Remington GS 124 and Remington 115 gr. JHP +P. It is loaded with the Federal at present. They are the "best" because they all function reliably in my pistol.
 
Rangers, Gold Dots, HST, or Golden Sabers in 124gr, 127gr, or 147gr. They all work as intended. The rest is up to how well you and your gun like it.
 
Not sure there is such thing as a "best" SD round. I think most of the modern JHP ammunition is pretty solid and reliable. At this point it often comes down to what you can find enough of to both test in your gun and keep on hand.

I have had Winchester Supreme Elite 124g +P in my XD for about a year. I like to rotate the ammo out of my HD gun at least once a year, but now I can't find any of this ammo in the store. I'll need to find another brand and buy enough to test it, keep in my gun AND have enough to rotate next year...
 
For defensive ammo, I use the Winchester Ranger T's in 127gr +p+ in my 4" SA XD9. Bought 3 boxes of it for $27/box and that included tax. BTW this was at a local gunshow I bought this at because everywhere I went didn't stock it.
 
After testing a dozen different loads, I found the inexpensive Winchester 124 gr. jhp was close to the performance of many of the cadillac brands, same price as WWB and bullet weight retention and expansion within .05" of the very best at half the cost.FBI pushed the 147 gr hydrashok for a while till in some actual shootings, its tendency to to over penetrate and not expand, caused them to drop it as standard round for their agents and go back to 124gr Hydrashok.My understand that lately they suppying their agents with the Hornaday Critical defense ammo, althoughh they readily admit it did poorly in the auto glass,and car door parts of their testing, but was excellent in penetrating heavy clothing and expansion after...So the search for the perfect bullet goes on.The military recently dropped the M193 in favor of the M855 because the M193 wouldn't pass the FBI's car door test.As far as killing insurgents the M193 was unbeatable as the bullet would break up and tumble making a 100 internal wounds.Probably illegal under the terms of the Geneva convention!
 
Back
Top