I'm all for it. In fact, they can start cutting funding across the board. There's too many funding addicts out there.I wonder how many people really want Congress to use the power of federal funding to silence dissenting opinions.
I'm all for it. In fact, they can start cutting funding across the board. There's too many funding addicts out there.I wonder how many people really want Congress to use the power of federal funding to silence dissenting opinions.
I'm all for it. In fact, they can start cutting funding across the board. There's too many funding addicts out there.
You mean take it back. It's their money to begin with.Berkeley is happy to take federal money when it suits their needs.
Really? There's a Marine recruiting station in the next town over in Emeryville. You're telling me that the Corps would even want the potential young recruit that's too stupid or lazy to find said recruiting station and travel the 3.4 miles to get there?This may be surprising, but there may well be a young man or woman in Berkeley that wants to and would benefit greatly from military service. Under the Berkeley rules of free speech, they would be denied easy access to that service.
I think the focus is too tight on this.
Really? There's a Marine recruiting station in the next town over in Emeryville. You're telling me that the Corps would even want the potential young recruit that's too stupid or lazy to find said recruiting station and travel the 3.4 miles to get there?
You mean take it back. It's their money to begin with.
Essentially, "I should be able to say whatever I want, whenever I want, about anything I want, and never have to fear being held accountable for my statements in any manner at all."
I mentioned before why your point of eliminating their taxes is intellectually dishonest. Those citizens are free to move about the country and do enjoy all the other freedoms and programs everyone else does. Your argument only makes sense if the suceeded from the union and it's walled off from outgoing traffic. I also said that I'm all for it."Funding addicts?"
Where, exactly, do you think that funding comes from? I'll remind you yet again that the median income of the city of Berkeley is significantly above the national average.
EDIT: And that's aside from the fact that UC is a state institution not a city one. So either stop taxing the state's citizens for whatever funding was going to be cut and let California tax its own, or stop holding their money ransom to force their state and local governments to adopt federal policies.
I mentioned before why your point of eliminating their taxes is intellectually dishonest. Those citizens are free to move about the country and do enjoy all the other freedoms and programs everyone else does. Your argument only makes sense if the suceeded from the union and it's walled off from outgoing traffic. I also said that I'm all for it.