Now you’re telling us that the “historical significance” of this gun surpasses the shootability, safety, parts and magazine availability, who can fix it when (not if) it breaks, etc.
So I misunderstood the intent of the thread when the OP initially asked if this gun a good value. And you’re telling us if you have a BHP, you have to have one of these, it’s the law. Well a gun I can’t shoot or don’t like shooting isn’t a good value for me. And you can’t compare one of these to a decent BHP.
I should have understood that you really meant that having a gun with historical significance, which is a conversation piece is your top priority. I stand corrected.
So I misunderstood the intent of the thread when the OP initially asked if this gun a good value. And you’re telling us if you have a BHP, you have to have one of these, it’s the law. Well a gun I can’t shoot or don’t like shooting isn’t a good value for me. And you can’t compare one of these to a decent BHP.
I should have understood that you really meant that having a gun with historical significance, which is a conversation piece is your top priority. I stand corrected.