scoobysnacker
New member
"a pleasure to shoot although a bit large for the caliber" should be read as "a pleasure to shoot BECAUSE a bit large for the caliber".The two new ones that I kept were a great buy and should remain " like new" because I just cannot warm up to the 92 package. The guns are beautifully made, shoot very accurately, hold a jillion rounds but I cannot get comfortable firing a 92 although many others will disagree.
The Beretta 84 BB from Aim was, until I received it, an unfired pistol (380) and is a pleasure to shoot although a bit large for the caliber. One could really defend life and home with that pistol.
Nowadays, everybody wants a pistol small enough to fit in your wallet, but in a caliber large enough to hunt bear and moose. The problem is, guns like that SUCK to shoot, the recoil is nasty. I haven't shot a Beretta 80 series, but I assume that like the CZ 82, the size/caliber ratio is proportionally correct to absorb the recoil. Beretta 92s, CZ 75s, Sig P226s, etc- they are "big" for 9x19, which means they are very comfortable to shoot.
You drop down a caliber size to 380 or 9x18, you can shrink the gun to "a reasonable size" to carry etc, and get the same level of comfort.
I went to the range the other day and shot some 9x18 pistols, and the CZ 82 is basically just above the boundaries of comfort. My PA 63 and P 64 aren't THAT much smaller, but the difference is enough that the caliber went from pleasant to a bit uncomfortable.