Base closure, warfighter support and our security

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not trying to make fun of you, I am supplying facts that prove you are full of it.
What amazes me about all you is that you cannot fathom or grasp or just plain live in denial that someone on this board is held to DOD security restrictions.
I know that IZHUMINTER and I are, and I'm positive that Handy is too, due to his duty position and the fact that he is a commisioned officer. What I cannot fathom or grasp is your insistence that the BRAC was influenced by something that happened to you sometime in 2003 or 2004 when the date was picked in 2001.
 
You folks can sit there all you want and make fun of me for I will continue to respect my committment to the DOD in the matters I have alluded to. What amazes me about all you is that you cannot fathom or grasp or just plain live in denial that someone on this board is held to DOD security restrictions.

Dude, you have no idea what "DOD security restrictions" are. If you did, you wouldn't keep pretending to have magic secrets that are too important to tell us, but that you can freely allude to so you can look all badass and stuff. I teach about and enforce DoD and Department of the Army security policy in accordance with Executive Order 12333 and the DoD and DA regulations, orders and instructions that implement it. I know what can and can't be discussed. I also know a wannabe poser when I see one...
 
BigBore,

No one cares about your security yada yada. We were having a discussion. Hinting at unmentionable state secrets hardly constitutes adding anything of value.
 
First - I grew up a long time ago and I don't need grandiosing or fantasizing to make myself appear self-important. I spent my life going to great lengths to avoid any attention.

Second - nothing you say is going to change a thing about what historically did occur and how it played into what is now being considered in BRAC. And that is my final posting about this.

If you want to continue belittling me then be my guest for it is only you who is showing how you get off on hurting others.
 
Is there anyone following this thread who has a legitimate anti-BRAC argument?

nothing you say is going to change a thing about what historically did occur and how it played into what is now being considered in BRAC. And that is my final posting about this.

You're absolutely right. Nothing anyone here says is going to impact on BRAC. That's not the point of this thread. It's for us to discuss BRAC. Spouting unsupported positions and then trying to hide behind a smokescreen of "secrets" is blood in the water to folks in here. Give us some reasons to listen to you (like evidence, or logic, or God forbid something that actually happened to you that might have some bearing on the topic) or please stick to the reloading threads where you really do have something to say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top