Ban Ammunition/Gun/Parts Sales to SF Agencies
- Thread starter Gary H
- Start date
Gary H.:
I'm not seeing anything contradicting the "while carrying out the functions" proviso. But there must be some confusion as indicated by this portion of the SFPOA statement:
Regrettably, even if the citizens were told that off-duty LEO carry was uneffected and it is forbidden, the mistatements would not be actionable.
Still, it's interesting that someone in CA would believe that off-duty carry was clearly exempted while SFPOA is stating otherwise.
Looks like there will be an immediate lint-storm over whether off-duty means "not carrying out the function...".
Wonder which it is?
I'm not seeing anything contradicting the "while carrying out the functions" proviso. But there must be some confusion as indicated by this portion of the SFPOA statement:
(emphasis mine)
Regrettably, even if the citizens were told that off-duty LEO carry was uneffected and it is forbidden, the mistatements would not be actionable.
Still, it's interesting that someone in CA would believe that off-duty carry was clearly exempted while SFPOA is stating otherwise.
Looks like there will be an immediate lint-storm over whether off-duty means "not carrying out the function...".
Wonder which it is?
Gary H,
Once again you have ducked my direct questions. I'll bet that you are one who decries the "nanny state", yet you appear to think it is just fine for you to assume that role, that you'll look after the best interests of San Franciscans, who clearly cannot take care of themselves.
Answer the questions.
Once again you have ducked my direct questions. I'll bet that you are one who decries the "nanny state", yet you appear to think it is just fine for you to assume that role, that you'll look after the best interests of San Franciscans, who clearly cannot take care of themselves.
Answer the questions.
Okay, I hope no one takes exception to my caustic sarcasm but...
Who cares about that crazy city? The only thing good that came out of there was Dirty Harry.
Although if you live there or have a loved one that lives there, it's more than understandable to be concerned.
But San Fran has for a long time harbored a politically esoteric group of citizens, and the handgun ban, enacted by a popular vote, reflects this. Many professed liberals think that an all-out handgun ban is just going too far, but in that city, such a ban was able to easily pass.
If the phenomenon begins to spread and it becomes illegal to own a handgun in Los Angeles, then I'll be worried. But San Francisco being what it is... well, it's just not something I tend to concern myself with. I still have a reasonable degree of faith that the new law is going to be ruled unconstitutional at some point, anyway.
Who cares about that crazy city? The only thing good that came out of there was Dirty Harry.
Although if you live there or have a loved one that lives there, it's more than understandable to be concerned.
But San Fran has for a long time harbored a politically esoteric group of citizens, and the handgun ban, enacted by a popular vote, reflects this. Many professed liberals think that an all-out handgun ban is just going too far, but in that city, such a ban was able to easily pass.
If the phenomenon begins to spread and it becomes illegal to own a handgun in Los Angeles, then I'll be worried. But San Francisco being what it is... well, it's just not something I tend to concern myself with. I still have a reasonable degree of faith that the new law is going to be ruled unconstitutional at some point, anyway.
Ironic, too, that he then accuses you of ducking his questions.
I have been ducked by sendec too many times for me to now expect answers. Any time I have cornered him on some point of fact that he can't counter, he just stops replying.
It's already clear to many of us that he takes the side of law enforcement officers over the side of the People every single time where clear "sides" are present in an issue. Hey, it's his choice, but I don't have to respect it.
-blackmind
I have been ducked by sendec too many times for me to now expect answers. Any time I have cornered him on some point of fact that he can't counter, he just stops replying.
It's already clear to many of us that he takes the side of law enforcement officers over the side of the People every single time where clear "sides" are present in an issue. Hey, it's his choice, but I don't have to respect it.
-blackmind