Bad news for stag arms

Frank,
I'm not going to continue the name calling....I appreciate your point. There is law and it must be followed.

We all know that compared to the total worth of the two companies that GM has deeper pockets....that is my point with the GM piece, their fine was much smaller compared to total company assets. So, my point was that lives mattered to the government less than guns.

Regarding, data handling, I don't know what business you guys are in, but an in house loss of 100 numbers is not unbelievable based on their production. So my point with the banking example is that the government puts sizable resources into auditing banking. When banks lose my personal info, the government seems to look the other way.

I have to admit, I do not know Stags case, but there are hundreds of legitimate explanations for lost data. I don't know theirs. Obviously they are not doing enough to satisfy the ATF or the ATF's boss. That is the law. These companies get into it knowing what a loss of data could mean and keep at it, so maybe they have figured out the solution that the rest of the world struggles with.
 
Nathan said:
...I have to admit, I do not know Stags case,...
That says it all. Your opinion is based on nothing more than your imagination and guesswork. Your opinion has nothing to do with what actually went on.
 
Back
Top