Awoken by a noise...

Self Contained Security System

This is what I use to check on my house from my bedside. I can't tell you how many times I've heard noises and I lie there watching prior to checking ANYTHING out. I love this system!!

http://www.amazon.com/Uniden-G955-Wireless-Surveillance-Monitor/dp/B00FQJEJNY?ie=UTF8&keywords=uniden%20security%20camera%20system%20wireless&qid=1462096151&ref_=sr_1_6&sr=8-6

With this self contained system you can put the monitor anywhere that's convenient with up to 4 cameras that you can place indoors and out. It also offers an APP for you to check the cameras from a smartphone....Nice if you're away from home OR in your safe zone during an incident.

My only complaint, the damn spiders build webs at night due to the infrared lights and the web trips the camera.
 
Last edited:
A long time ago, I found myself "clearing the house" a couple of times. It worked fine---because there was no one there. Then I learned better.

I have for some time been passing on advice here to not do so, and to not open a door when the visitor is not known. Yet knocks on the door continue to worry.

It should be patently obvious that a remote security camera system is the best answer by far. I've seen them, and I have seen how someone at lunch somewhere can see visitors at the door and the interior of the house on a smartphone. It also worked from the driveway.

It took me until this morning to order one.
 
johnwilliamson062 said:
And I thought I was a light sleeper...
I might clear the house in response to a provocative event once every six months. Probably less often. Maybe once a year. Maybe I should track it on the calendar.
If I was waking up once a month and going to condition orange, I would make adjustments in my life. Either move, see a psychiatrist, or both.
I've previously lived in situations outside the US where condition orange/red was a daily norm, but never when I was in a place I would have called "home".
Click to expand...

I have a two year old who likes to wander and live in a fairly secluded area that has a creek a few hundred yards away from the house on the parcel I live on. The coyotes have been reproducing fairly rapidly. While I love where I live and what it allows me to do (and the absence of people frankly) it presents some challenges. Chances are I am up more than once a month checking out "that noise". Until we have a better plan of action my wife actually sleeps in my two year olds room. I sleep in the same room as my one year old because I might as well. Yes there is an alarm system but strange "bumps in the night" are common around here and are investigated. No I cannot call the police that often to "check out that noise" for me.

It likely influences my tactical decisions. I am simply not going to wander out looking for what is likely my wife or child with a gun even in the low ready position. Nor am I going to go into lock down mode. The bad news is it means I am responding in a way that is less than ideal to what could be a real threat.


In regards to wireless cameras: I am not giving someone the ability to hack into my home network and be given an unmonitored view of the inside and activity of my house. Right now my biggest tactical advantage is knowing where the kids normally leave toys at night
 
Posted by Lohman446:
No I cannot call the police that often to "check out that noise" for me.
Click to expand...
No one can do that. One calls when it is clear that there are intruders on the house.

To traipse out with gun in hand to find them is a very poor idea, for reasons discussed at great length in this forum over the years. No knowledgeable expert recommends down that.

In regards to wireless cameras: I am not giving someone the ability to hack into my home network and be given an unmonitored view of the inside and activity of my house.
Click to expand...
That is something of a risk, but it is probably one of one's least serious risks when it comes to hacking stuff, and I think the systems do mitigate more serious risks far more effectively than they create.

Right now my biggest tactical advantage is knowing where the kids normally leave toys at night
Click to expand...
I fall to see how that would provide anyone with any "tactical advantage" whatsoever. Is that a joke?
 
OldMarksman said:
fall to see how that would provide anyone with any "tactical advantage" whatsoever. Is that a joke?
Click to expand...

Its a light hearted reference to a certain advantage one has in their own home. I know where all the lighting sources are, where the "shadowed corners", where the furniture is. I can navigate the house in the dark and know what looks out of place.

I have a different thought on what clearing a house is. It is investigating a noise. If I see a real threat the intent is, if at all possible, to gather the family and retreat to a single defensible position. My wife is competent with her handgun so it is far preferable to go "all in" and defend a single location while we wait for the police.

When some of you are referencing clearing a house in some tactically sound manner (which I take to mean firearm at least in the low ready position) I am taking that to mean how you investigate a noise. My firearm is as relatively "ready" as it can be without being obvious when I check on noises (proper grip, finger forward, behind my leg). I am careful of corners and other hiding spots. Is it the most effective way? Probably not. But I have no intention of confronting an intruder if I can know everyone else is safe in the house without it

My situation also gives less advantage to a security system as I am going to have to actively gather other family members. I cannot simply see the threat and barricade myself in my bedroom.
 
Posted by Lohman446:
I know where all the lighting sources are, where the "shadowed corners", where the furniture is. I can navigate the house in the dark and know what looks out of place.
Click to expand...
Many people have believed in the importance of that argument over the years.

But--it has been tested, and found wanting. In FoF simulations, defenders who knew every centimeter of their structures have set out to find and engage intruders who did not. Over the several years in which such scenarios were played out in the old National Tactical Invitationals, only once, or maybe twice, did the defender who went hunting prevail.

The hunter is always at a distinct disadvantage, and the likelihood of his being ambushed is so great that such a tactic is to be avoided.

My firearm is as relatively "ready" as it can be without being obvious when I check on noises (proper grip, finger forward, behind my leg).
Click to expand...
Your firearm cannot stop bullets, nor can it prevent an ambush and crossfire from those who may have been waiting and listening for your approach.

My situation also gives less advantage to a security system as I am going to have to actively gather other family members.
Click to expand...
Yes, if there is someone in the house, you certainly do have to worry about others.

Nice to know where the intruders are, though.

But if there is no one there, you can stay put, and avoid the risk of encountering and shooting an innocent, and yes, that does happen.

This is not a new discussion. Spend some time searching though six or eight years of posts on the subject.
 
But--it has been tested, and found wanting. In FoF simulations, defenders who knew every centimeter of their structures have set out to find and engage intruders who did not. Over the several years in which such scenarios were played out in the old National Tactical Invitationals, only once, or maybe twice, did the defender who went hunting prevail.
Click to expand...

Been there. I recall my buddy - came out of the exercise and said:

"Glenn, I shot my son".

Same result at Advanced Tactical classes at KRtraining.com The naive who went out to challenge the folks who broke him were 'killed' easily. Most of them wandered down a fatal funnel trap.

Unless, you have to save someone - stay put. BTW, with the alarm suggestions - get ones that you can control from a safe area and sounds a loud obnoxious siren or horn.
 
Posted by Glenn E. Meyer:
Been there. I recall my buddy - came out of the exercise and said:

"Glenn, I shot my son"
Click to expand...
That illustrates an important point.

When the hunting defender is focused on something he thinks is ahead of him, and he suddenly becomes aware of movement in his peripheral vision, (1) if it is an intruder with a firearm, the intruder has to react and shoot instantly, and he may not be able to do so timely; but (2) he has an absolute obligation to identify the target before shooting.

A violent criminal actor in the house is unlikely to take the time to do that.
 
I have two very alert dogs. Any time they go off in the middle of the night, the first thing I reach for is my gun before I even think of investigating.
 
This is such a hard call. Living with a cat is like living in a haunted house. There will always be noises in the night from rooms that are "empty". Imo, stay put with the weapon, listen, call out for your kids, turn on lights, give the "intruder" plenty of time to identify itself, cat, child sneak thief, whatever.

Don't go after an intruder in the darkest not necessary to hunt one down, and just taking up your weapon raises the risk of injury.

If the lights coming on and you doing roll call scares off an intruder, well, you won. Finding him and killing him isn't they'll, is it? Your goal is to keep your family safe. Every situation plays out differently, and sometimes this an would fail. Do whatever you think you have to do, I'm going to continue using this plan.
 
All of this "house-clearing-is-for-the-professionals" is nonsense. Get up and handle your business
Click to expand...

More false bravado from the inexperienced. Have you ever trained in this? The only time a single person will win when clearing a structure is when he is either extremely lucky or facing a grossly incompetent subject.

Better off hardening your home so you have time to secure your family. Make sure no one can get to your kid's rooms without going past yours first. Having a family to protect should make you even more determined to use good tactics and not get yourself killed.
 
I feel like I agree with those sentiments.

Knowingly going after an intruder when you and your loved ones are safe involves a LOT of risk. Someone, anyone, anywhere, could be hurt when shots are fired. There is no way to guarantee that the bad guy will be the only one who dies. Home defense, by its definition is all about defending yourself and remaining unharmed, right? If they come to you, go get 'em, tiger, but the smart thing will always be to avoid the fight.

If a person finds an intruder,staying alive is the primary goal, among others, and I believe that killing or injuring, or capturing the hoodlum is far down the list.

I confess that I deal with every situation differently. I get night noises all of the time. I have three stories, and this place is defensive, and very, very unsuitable for hunting down bad guys from inside. If I ever hear voices, I will hunker down. Period. I do investigate noises when I have gone through a few checks, such as checking whether it bothered the cats. Those cats, much like a dog, know what is going on, and don't usually respond to a normal sound. Most of the time, when I hear something, I just lay awake for a while listening. This creaky old place won't even let the cats slip around quietly.
 
Years ago in my first house I identified the next door neighbor's frequent visits as drug activity. Decided to mind my own business until one night when a pizza delivery guy showed up at my house wth a pie for them. Then I realized that if he got the address wrong someone looking to rip them off could too. Situational awareness needs to extend beyond your property.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top