ATF Project Gunrunner

Gee you don't think the current Libya action could in any way be to take attention off the gun scandal, perhaps some info about how high this goes was about to come out.
Alex
 
Apparently a Univision reporter was willing to ask the President directly about this: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20046151-10391695.html

Short summary:
Serious mistakes MAY have been made and IF so, people will be held responsible. AG Holder and the President did not authorize such an operation and presumably will not be among those "held responsible."

It does lead me to wonder how you get multiple federal agencies and an AUSA working on this when nobody at the top authorized or supported it.
 
They failed to get themselves a get out of jail free card. Or maybe they did and now they are trying to figure out who to blame it on. Seems awful slow and obstructive in this new era of accountable government.
 
I keep looking for a reasonable explanation of WHY they thought this was a good idea. The picture below is the best explanation that I have come up with to explain the reasoning that went on in the ATF.

FileGnomes-plan.png


Even the underpants gnomes had sounder reasoning than the ATF though.
 
I keep looking for a reasonable explanation of WHY they thought this was a good idea.
A few GS-12's in the Phoenix division needed a big bust. A really big bust. A really big bust that looks sexy on the evening news.

They got cocky, and they got careless. Foresight took a holiday.
 
Crosshair,

I keep looking for a reasonable explanation of WHY they thought this was a good idea.

How's this?

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."
-- Frederic Bastiat
 
The problem is that the legal system did not allow it. The whole thing was idiotic.

So where did all the gun running money go?

And gosh letting thousands of guns across the border so that you can then point to it and say; "There are thousands of guns going across the border! We need to fix this!" does fall in line with some other craziness various governments have tried over the years.
 
The fact that a rogue federal agency has broken US laws should not come as a surprise.

BTW: The US ambassador to Mexico has resigned after Wiki-Leaks made public a cable where the ambassador dared to criticize the Mexican government.

Pascual also may have ruffled feathers in the Mexican government and Calderon's National Action Party by dating the daughter of Francisco Rojas, the congressional leader of the former longtime ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party. Mexican officials and the U.S. Embassy have declined to comment on that matter.

One of the leaked diplomatic cable that most angered Calderon was dated Jan. 29, 2010, and referred to friction between Mexico's army and navy while detailing an operation that led to the death of drug lord Arturo Beltran Leyva.

Pascual said the U.S., which had information locating Beltran Leyva, originally took it to the army, which refused to move quickly. Beltran Leyva was eventually brought down in a shootout with Mexican marines, which have since taken the lead in other operations against cartel capos.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/19/ambassador-mexico-resigns-following-wikileaks-cable/
 
Obama answering some questions on this matter.

Go to the middle of the page to see the video.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8300-31727_162-10391695.html

People have probably died because of ATF's selling guns to illegals and, for a long time, the Administration and ATF were blaming us gun owners, and our FFL's, for the illegal sales to drug cartel members.

All of this appears to have been a blatant lie.

I am extremely disappointed with the ATF. It is time for serious changes to be made to that organization IMHO.

ETA: New letter from Senator Grassley that was posted at another site I belong to:

http://grassley.senate.gov/about/upload/Judiciary-ATF-03-16-11-Letter-to-CBP-Fast-and-Furious.pdf
 
Last edited:
This is simply another iteration of "Showtime" without the standoff and inferno. They want to make a show of the "problem" by exacerbating it to get more funding in their budget.
 
I watched the CBS news comments by the President. I find it unlikely that the President knew nothing about it, but I will grant that it is possible. I find it even less likely that the AG knew nothing about it. Whatever the facts about knowledge may actually be, I suspect that someone's going to step up to the plate, claim that he was entirely responsible, and be the fall guy.
 
I keep looking for a reasonable explanation of WHY they thought this was a good idea.

To be able to say that most of the illegal guns in Mexico come from the USA?
Good question.
For what it's worth Glen Beck caught this story friday morning from Wayne LaPierre. I suppose he's about to bulldog it.
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/videos/?uri=channels/451373/1230933

Original article/compilation....
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/oba...ial-fed-operation-smuggling-guns-into-mexico/
 
Can you say Reichstag fire?

This is a typical Hegelian Dialectic wherein the authors of the "crisis" have a predetermined "solution"; and when the "crisis" fails to materialize the authors claim credit for its prevention.

In this case, they sought to show that there was an unbridled flow of firearms into Mexico which failed to manifest on its own. So they decided to help it along through a program which would falsely skew the numbers higher.

The solution was to be the enactment of restrictions on firearms to staunch the fallacious flow. The cessation of the authors' program would give the false impression that the solution had worked because fewer firearms would be flowing into Mexico.

They thereby gain political power while achieving their goal of firearms restrictions to American citizens.

Unfortunately, for the administration, their plan backfired and the same firearms that they were told would reappear did exactly that with devastating results.

As Rahm Emanuel said, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste; and what I mean by that is, it is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before."
 
Last edited:
Too bad the agency remained unmanned for a while, awaiting the nomination of Andrew Travers back in November. He could have cleaned this whole mess up just in time.

Would a Governor, for example Jan Brewer, have any options for bringing a better understanding to the matter thru the court system, if she was concerned about the way a federal agency was operating in her state?
 
Too bad the agency remained unmanned for a while, awaiting the nomination of Andrew Travers back in November.
Actually, they've been unable to get a director approved since Truscott resigned in disgrace back in 2006.
 
Actually, they've been unable to get a director approved since Truscott resigned in disgrace back in 2006.
Oh THAT explains something now. The ATF has just been behaving like a chicken with its head cut off, running and flailing all over the place. ;)
 
BATF / DoJ F*-ups no surprise

Why is this a surprise? I've been dealing with DoJ and other 3 letter agencies as a contractor for decades. Most agencies are mediocre, DoJ is bottom of the barrel from a real performance perspective. While their public and congressional relations offices are truly first class, most of the decisions appear to be politically driven (vs. doing what's overtly right or THE LAW), and consistently poorly planned and managed. (can you say "Virtual Casebook" fiasco?)

The problems that make it to the light of day are "only the tip of the iceberg" according to one former deputy director. The rest are often classified or tightly held specifically to prevent embarrassment, not national security. The root problem is an inherently corrupt culture starting at the top that needs to continue the CYA for face-saving and retirements. This tends to transcend changes in leadership.

In the recent ($10B ceiling) award Integrated Wireless Network program that is supposed to provided integrated and interoperable communications between various agencies, the FBI has taken a very parochial view that it's their way or the highway for the other agencies involved. So much for saving taxpayers $20-50B by working together, which will make the SBInet screwup by DHS look like chump change. This is going to hit the fan bigtime in the next 911 incident. Feel free to legitimately blame those problems on the FBI leadership of today.

In closing, I'll allow that some contractors believe that FBI most appropriately stands for "F*-ups Beyond Imagination". What BATF realistically means is left as an exercise for the reader. Any FBI'ers or BATF'ers out there care to differ?
 
Back
Top