Are there any rifles that have no POI shift with a bayonet attached?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I duck taped a kitchen knife to my 22 and didn't see difference in POI. I guess I'll try duck tapping 2 kitchen knives to it and test later.
 
I shoot a friends Polish M44 Nagant quite often,,,

I shoot a friends Polish M44 Nagant quite often,,,
It's not the most precise shooter in any case.

But the groups do get quite larger with the bayonet extended.

I have another buddy with a Chinese SKS,,,
He says if you extend the bayonet on that rifle,,,
You are very fortunate indeed if you can hit the ground.

Just saying,,,

Aarond

.
 
In the military they are not installed unless it's gonna be close contact, very close.
Click to expand...

Depends on the military. If you are talking about Mosin Nagants used by the Soviet Union in WW2, you are wrong.

They had it attached all the time, they didn't even issue scabbards.
 
"...don't think it has anything to do with where the bayonet is mounted..." It's absolutely due to where the weight is. Putting the bayonet on an original M-16 actually bent the barrels with the weight.
"...air pressure/gas expansion hitting the bayonet..." There's not enough resistance from the mass a knife blade to do any such thing.
"...Suppressors are a close range accessory..." Suppressors are not a normal issue thing at all. You cannot suppress supersonic ammo.
 
POI will most always change with the addition of any muzzle device.
Ideally, the change in harmonics is consistent- and therefore known and not an issue as it is anticipated and compensated for. Anyone with a suppressed rifle knows the POI shift and simply dials the difference depending on whether the device is on, or off, the rifle. "Accuracy" should remain the same.

Barrel contact that's inconsistent, such as lying it over sticks, or barrel-mounted bipods (cringe-worthy) will not produce consistent changes to harmonics and will cause not only a POI shift- but often a degradation in accuracy as well.
 
The simplest way for M1 Garand owners to test the 'harmonic' effect of attaching a bayonet - and thus accuracy and group dispersion on POI - is to shoot one 8-rd clip without the bayo attached, and then a second 8-rd clip with it mounted.

At, say, 100-yds, even with a tight bayo-on-barrel lock-up, you'll see a different POI and some amount of dispersion.

Now the real question is: how much does this change matter? Holding tight MOA groups on paper targets at 600-yds is one thing.

Inside 200-yd, in combat conditions, firing on enemy soldiers charging you (think: Chosin Reservoir), the effect of the bayo on "combat accuracy" is probably meaningless, ... and yet a mounted bayo gave the soldier an immediate secondary weapon to stay in the fight, once that en bloc clip went PING! :eek:
 
Last edited:
I agree with several others, the bayonet, if contacting the barrel, is affecting the harmonics of the barrel. This is the same reason "free floating" a barrel is the fastest way to accurize (debatable) your AR-15.

Harmonics: The act of firing a gun generates a rapid pressure increase within the barrel bore, causing the barrel to resonate and vibrate in a whip-like fashion. The resultant harmonic oscillations of the barrel affect the terminal phase of the projectile's internal ballistics and in turn the initial status of its external ballistics, and therefore need to be minimized or tuned to limit their effects on accuracy. Generally the harmonic effects are proportional to the square of the barrel length, and so are generally only of concern in long guns such as rifles but not handguns. Some external accessories, called tuners or de-resonators, can also be mounted onto the barrel to modify the harmonic wave pattern so that the node is shifted as near to the muzzle as possible. Airguns have significantly lower barrel pressure, and therefore are far less affected by barrel harmonics than firearms.
Click to expand...

So think of that bayonet as a form of tuning the resonant frequency of that barrel. Pretty sure this is why, historically, bayonets were for charges and close-quarter-who-cares-what-the-MOA-shift-is-because-the-enemy-is-10-feet-away.
 
I seldom shot my AK with the bayonet but the POI didn’t change the few times I did.
Click to expand...

How would you know? Most of the groups I have seen from AKs looked more like buckshot patterns than measurable groups ;p

Even a sniper rifle in a suppressed configuration is a close range weapon system.
Click to expand...

Really? You are saying a suppressed rifle is inaccurate/does not have a repeatable POI? I call BS. It may have a different POI with the can on as opposed to with it off, but it most certainly can be sighted in with the can on and be used that way at range.

You cannot suppress supersonic ammo.
Click to expand...
The supersonic crack of the bullet is still there, true enough, but the suppressor does reduce the sound and muzzle blast of the rifle. A reduced firing signature is a good thing, if you don't want to be seen and thus targeted.
 
We're off-topic here, but suppressors are commonly used on more current SWS's and will likely be expanded to be standard kit for many more.

Disadvantages; frequent disassembly/cleaning, length added to the weapon making handling more difficult, and added weight. The advantages of sound suppression, flash suppression (perhaps even more important than sound) and enhanced communication between the sniper and his spotter make having it available, a no-brainer. The Operator will determine whether or not it would be advantageous to deploy depending on the nature of the engagement-but saying a suppressed SWS is a "close range weapon system" seems to be devoid of any factual basis.

Recent article on use of suppressors on the battlefield from the Military Times:

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...-suppressors-will-change-battlefield-tactics/
 
saying a suppressed SWS is a "close range weapon system" seems to be devoid of any factual basis.
Click to expand...

Really??

Huh, you should write the SOTIC committee and let them know! :)

Do not confuse employment with capability. Audie Murphy discovered that 60 mm mortar rounds had the capability to be used as makeshift hand grenades. That has nothing to do with how the US Army employed 60 mm Mortar ammunition.

1. A suppressor is not a functioning suppressor without subsonic ammunition.

Little physics:

Lower velocity = lower energy = shorter range..

Does anything else need to be said or do we understand the physics and why your suppressed sniper rifle is a close range weapon with a suppressor as compared to its engagement distances unsuppressed?

2. Shooting a suppressor with supersonic ammunition turns it into nothing more than a very expensive flash hider. A nice flash hider but it is not a suppressor anymore. I agree the sonic crack can actually help in concealment but that is NOT how suppressors are employed in the US Army at the time I was trained and USED them.

3. Once more suppressors are pretty restricted in their life limits and a round count was required. As suppressor technology advances I agree that it would not be a bad thing and is becoming more practical to use.
 
Once more, in terms of practical sniper field craft, a suppressor does little to reduce the number one thing that gets you busted in your shooting position. It is not the muzzle flash that gives you away. It is the dirt and leaves that gets kicked up by pressure wave of the round exiting the barrel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top