I've been beating my head against the wall arguing with a rather smug fellow whose logic goes something like this:
1) anyone who carries a gun exagerates the threat of criminal attack;
2) anyone who exagerates the threat of criminal attack is paranoid;
3) anyone who is paranoid is not fit to carry a gun;
4) therefore, anyone who carries a gun is not fit to carry a gun.
Frustrating. I already tried to discuss my own experiences as a crime victim and why I choose to carry a gun. Nothing doing.
Anyone else had a similar argument with someone who is just convinced that us folks who carry are "paranoid."
My only remaining argument is, "once you've been a crime victim, you'll understand why I carry a gun."
Got anything else?
1) anyone who carries a gun exagerates the threat of criminal attack;
2) anyone who exagerates the threat of criminal attack is paranoid;
3) anyone who is paranoid is not fit to carry a gun;
4) therefore, anyone who carries a gun is not fit to carry a gun.
Frustrating. I already tried to discuss my own experiences as a crime victim and why I choose to carry a gun. Nothing doing.
Anyone else had a similar argument with someone who is just convinced that us folks who carry are "paranoid."
My only remaining argument is, "once you've been a crime victim, you'll understand why I carry a gun."
Got anything else?