Another misguided case

Mleake , "SYG failure" ..Sorry, bad choice of words for this thread…. Defense argued SYG and failed.- better?
The comment was not aimed at anyone in particular here … There seem to be many SYG proponents ready to jump on this woman’s bandwagon, just a general caution against that (probably unnecessary here) … at least until more info. Becomes available.

I’d like to know more about this : http://www.scribd.com/doc/90281395/Marissa-Alexander-Injunction-Against-Her-Abuser … as in … did he have a right to be in the house?
Note :Only one set of signatures on it…. Was it ever issued ? If so, Castle doctrine should have applied ? ... unless she invited him in.
Edit: it does appear to have been signed by the judge and delivered in open court…but was disallowed at her trial :confused:

Actually , there are several things about this case I’d have to know before supporting her.
 
Last edited:
IMO, same goes for this case as most posted here on TFL...just not enough confirmed factual data to form an opinion. Don't think the media or a blog site fueled by the accused will have all the facts straight.
 
The only thing I looked at on that site were two things, The ridiculous intro and the deposition. The deposition from the husband is what has me now re-thinking my original stance as to her innocence or guilt. as I stated, maybe not SYG which I think her attorney hung his hat on, but certainly some self defense statute.
 
My simple take-away from this case is the general proposition that a "warning shot" may suggest that deadly force is not justified.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top