couldbeanyone said:I wouldn't go with the CCI Stinger or Velocitor. Stingers actually expand too well and don't penetrate enough, only 6.9 inches from a 2.75 inch barrel.
couldbeanyone said:Velocitors are expensive and don't really gain you any velocity from a pistol barrel in my chronograph testing.
couldbeanyone said:I would go with CCI Minimags, Remington Vipers, or Aguila SuperMaximums.
Manco is absolutely correct about this. The longer the barrel, the better Velocitors do. Out of a four inch or shorter barrel there is virtually no difference between it and mini-mags. I'm not saying that Velocitors still woundn't be good, just that in short barrels you don't gain anything but muzzle blast and they are more expensive.Originally Posted by Manco
I haven't done my own testing, but according to measurements that I've compiled over time, out of a 6" revolver barrel one could reasonably expect from the Velocitor an additional 120 fps or so over the Mini-Mag. Out of even shorter barrels, the difference would be less, I'd expect (and as you've found),
maxi-mags.
couldbeanyone said:I can't disagree with anyone about Remington priming. I would say that I have more duds out of Remington than any other brand.
Whoops my bad. Yes Maxi-Mags are 22 magnum. Don't know how my mind can think mini-mag and my fingers type maxi-mag, but, I guess they can. I fixed it, thanks for catching it.Originally Posted by 8shot357
Aren't Maxi-Mage a 22 magnum?
Hollow point bullets are useless in .22LR.
and in .22LR it makes no difference.