Playboypenguin
Moderator
I am weeding a few newer Smith revolvers out of my collection and replacing them with older models...but it is not for the reason many would think. It is not because of the locks. The locks do not bother me at all.
The reason I am ditching some of the newer Smith revolvers is the way they put the logo on the side of the gun. I just hate the laser etched logos. I am weeding out the ones with the laser etched logos in favor of ones with engraved (roll marked) logos. One of the ones with the engraved logo even has a lock and I could not care less.
Anyone that knows me is aware of the fact that I occasionally like to polish up or bead blast my firearms to give them a more refined look. With the laser etched logos you just cannot do that because of the fact that the laser etched logos will be easily damaged by such actions. Plus, I think the laser etched logos just looks cheap.
Anyone else feel this way or am I the only one this crazy and nit-picky.
The reason I am ditching some of the newer Smith revolvers is the way they put the logo on the side of the gun. I just hate the laser etched logos. I am weeding out the ones with the laser etched logos in favor of ones with engraved (roll marked) logos. One of the ones with the engraved logo even has a lock and I could not care less.
Anyone that knows me is aware of the fact that I occasionally like to polish up or bead blast my firearms to give them a more refined look. With the laser etched logos you just cannot do that because of the fact that the laser etched logos will be easily damaged by such actions. Plus, I think the laser etched logos just looks cheap.
Anyone else feel this way or am I the only one this crazy and nit-picky.