Am I that unusual?

I don't think that you're weird at all, you've just got excellent taste. I too am among the younger members here (I'm 25) and while I own guns that are newer, I've always been more interested in older designs. I, like my father, am interested in both guns and history, so it is only natural that the guns which interest me most are those with some historical significance.

My first firearm was a Mosin Nagant M44. I bought the gun both because of its historical significance and because it was very affordable (I paid a whopping $55 for it). That rifle was soon followed by a Carcano M1891 Cavalry Carbine and a K-31.

My first foray into handguns was a CZ-52 which, while great fun, was my second choice to a Webley Mk. V which sold before I could get the money together (a Mk. V is still on my "list" and is the inspiration for my handle). That gun was followed by a Walther PP .32 Auto. My first new handgun was my CZ-75B which, while purchased new, is a 30+ year old design.

The real "ah ha" moment for me was when I bought my first revolver: a S&W M28-2 with a 4" barrel. Since then, my primary interest has been revolvers with the majority of them being S&W though I also own or have owned Tarus, H&R, Ruger, Colt, and Webley revolvers.

Like yourself, I was initially very adverse to the dreaded S&W lock. However, I came across a beautiful S&W M21-4 in nickel for a good price and even the lock couldn't dissuade me from purchasing it. When I found the gun to be an excellent shooter that gave me no issue, I decided to investigate further about the lock and came to the conclusion that it wasn't nearly the issue it had been made out to be and that I was depriving myself of some very nice revolvers over it.

While I do own more "contemporary" firearms like my 922r-converted Saiga .223 and my S&W 1076 10mm and appreciate them for what they are, the older designs are still what stirs my soul and peaks my interest. I am not alone in this either as my dad is much like me and my younger brothers are interested in older weapons too.

The older of my brothers (4 years my junior) has no interest in handguns that aren't revolvers and pines after SxS double-barrel shotguns, lever-action rifles, and single-shots like Shiloh Sharps and Ruger No. 1's Of course, this isn't suprising as when he was little he preferred to watch John Wayne movies rather than cartoons.

My next younger brother is primarily interested in building a WWII collection. So far, he's got a Mosin-Nagant M91/30, Yugo M48 Mauser (I know, not exactly WWII), Lee-Enfield No. 1 Mk. III, Walther P38, and Colt 1911.
 
It is getting harder, more expensive for more beat up equipment now a days then even when I started shooting only 3 years ago.

I am trying to push to get a "loan" from my parents to get some of them just because the prices are going up so fast and just have them hold onto it till I am 21.

I cant even really find a 4inch model 27 smith without a lock in decent condition for a reasonable price (more than the new ones with a lock).

In the prefect world I will have an internship this summer in my home state (interviews this week) and as soon as I am 21 in June get my purchase permit and get a model 27 4inch or browning hi power.
Browning felt okay but the one I played with had different grips. But I like the 1911 and it is suposed to be similar.
 
Last edited:
This seems to be a post for the kids to play, so I'm 28, my brother is 23, so I'll play. My first handgun was a Beretta Cougar. The only handguns I own now are single stack, preferably single action semis and a few da revolvers. I have a PF9, which like the other poster with a KT stated, it is not for collecting or fun shooting (I actually hate shooting the gun). The rifles and shotguns I own are old designs and are wood and blue steel. My go-to pistol is a NIB Para 1911 single stack that I've shot to hell. Newer features, but it was in the platform I wanted. My brother's shotgun is a new make 500A (mine is older), and he has a fairly recent manufacture P226 in .40, but everything else is old school like me.

A lot of it for us younger shooters will be about operating on a budget that we're comfortable with and paring through what calibers we'd love to own, in what actions, and then ultimately what is available out there for the price we're willing to pay. I wanted another bolt gun, I wanted an Enfield, and I wanted it in .308. Boom. Ishapore had the answer. I wanted an AK but had always admired the SKS, wanted the round that went with it, found a great deal on a Yugo with features I didn't necessarily want but were cool to have. Done. It just so happens that the market dictates that old war trophies are what this guy can afford. And it just so happens... this guy is totally happy with that. :D
 
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=279523074

I got mine for a little cheaper, but this would be what you're looking for. Yes, it will fire .308 just fine. Some people recommend a headspace check, but at no time has anyone reported of any ruptured cases or other problems when firing factory .308. Beautiful, oh, beautiful Enfield. .303 ain't easy to find these days!!

Edit: a little more info. It is a RFI made 7.62 x 51 NATO bolt gun based on the mkIII design. Ishapore 2A1 is its common nomenclature. It was the last iteration of the Enfield ever produced and ceased in 1975.
 
I've got the same bug. If you saw my collection, you might assume that I'd fallen asleep in the late 50's and woke up in 2012. It's not that I have some sentimental attachment to older guns, I just prefer their design. Polymer guns feel like you're shooting a stapler.
 
Scouts was really expensive to do anything shooting related and you had to be older to do it.

And with that there were so many rules that you had to follow and be in groups of 4 all the time. Just did not really care for it.

And the people who were in my year were not that pleasant.

I rather do things cheaper, with better people, and fewer restrictions.

Polymer guns feel like you're shooting a stapler.

I like this.

But I am composite materials engineering so I am designing that stapler lol.
So many plastics...
 
Last edited:
Must have been your troop/council/whatever.

As one who until very recently was an adult scout leader, for our troop....

Cost: $0.

Age limit: 11 (ie, if you were in Boy Scouts, you were old enough)

Calibers: .22 LR, 20 gauge, 12 gauge, .50 cal (black powder)

True, there were a fair number of other rules that might put somebody off, but to say that shooting in scouts doesn't count....
 
Newer isn't always better. Some designs just define firearms and you happen to think like a lot of us do.

As far as optics go, give it 20 or 30 years, your eyes might eventually think otherwise. :)
 
Drummer101:

Scouts was really expensive to do anything shooting related and you had to be older to do it...

Maybe they've changed the rules. I remember shooting in Scouts when I was fairly young - pre-teen I'm sure.
 
my friend i might agree with you about some parts of the gun world, cant beat the tech in a vector kriss (until they make one in a rifle cartridge).. however, i cant say iv ever loved a bolt action rifle they way i love a mauser with a metal butt plate. Crisp and strong, iv shot alot of different guns and none other feels like an old mauser. i couldnt suggest one enough
 
Back
Top