Aftermarket barrels for glocks

[KShaft]

thanks everyone.

your comments are very much appreciated.

as to my comments about the gt'ers; the whiney emotional responses that complain about my grammar, are evident of some of these guys maturity level.(note i say SOME!!!!)
sorry guys, ill write my posts like i would a master thesis from now on. ill forgo substance and be critical of others format rather than the true content.
people talk a lot and say little. they use flowery words only to demonstrate thier venacular rather than make any worth wild point.
well i guess since higher math comes with such a difficulty, we have to be critical of others on something.

now when you guys can say that youve been trained and done work under the guidelines of the NSA (via USMC for me but the same would go for any branch who does SIG-INT) come back and talk to me. otherwize go back to your campus, or wherever, and
theorize your little inexperienced hearts out, and pray for socialism(i know you do!!!).

as to everyone else, youve been very helpful.
thank you so much
and good night.
k.s.

 

[dawg23]

KShaft:

I agree - folks shouldn't be criticizing your grammatical skills. Your post at 11:07a.m. on 10/6/01 was very well written, with the possible exception of the following:

1.You should have inserted a comma after "thanks", in your salutation.

2. The sentence in line 2 is ambiguous. We are unable to determine who "much appreciates" the comments (we assume that you are the appreciative entity).

3. In line 4, no comma is need after the word "grammar", "guys" should be "guys' " and the word "i" should be capitalized (atually the entire sentence needs to be reworded).

4. In line 6, the word "ill" should be "I'll" and "master thesis" should be "master's thesis".

5. In line 7, "others" should be "others' ", and the word "true" is somewhat redundant.

6. In line 8 the word "thier" should be "their".

7. In line 9 you probably meant to use "vocabulary" rather than "venacular" (which, by the way, is actually spelled "vernacular") and I assume you meant "worth while" instead of "worth wild".

8. In line 12, "youve" should be "you've".

9. In line 13 your syntax is rather convoluted, but I think you should have used "which" in place of "who".

10.In line 17, "youve" should be "you've" (again).

11. Your failures to use proper capitalization are too numerous to list, but instances occur in almost every line of your post.

In closing, let me say again that your communication skills are outstanding, and that I presume that they are indicative of your level of education, your level of maturity and/or your IQ.

Good luck in writing your "master thesis".

Dawg23

 

[gmj]

bas sto

Have a 92 fs modified by Dave Sams, has a Bar-Sto and groups under 1.5 inches at 50 yards.

 

[KShaft]

once again dogie,

when you have sereved your country in a manner that has more to do than tieing a little bow to your lapel or flag to your car; and when you have done intelligence work for the government come and talk to me.
otherwise go and converse with your socialist friends over things you have no idea about and allow yourself to be spoon fed "knowledge" by mass media or even worse, opinionated professors.
i love little sheltered children.
there so cute....
anyway lets end this silly bickering (i responded to you so we're even!) as i do agree my grammar sucks. i could be more of an ass but what purpose would that serve? when your copying messages at a rediculously fast rate, grammar goes out the window. of course, how would you know about this? i really dont care to be that articulate on a computer anyhow....
and i do like glocks...
but being as ive owned or shot:
m16a2s, , 249 SAWs, 240Gs, MK 19s, M-2s, m1a1 turret(didnt get to fire....awwww) m9s
owned:
glock 17, 19, 22, 31, 35,
les baer pII, wilson 2-tone protector, sistema colt,
sig 220, 226,
hk usp 40, 45
browning hp
cz75 (awesome!)
i look for ways to make the glock shoot better inherently and practically. i appreciate all the guys who are open minded enough to realize this and help me out.
if you dont agree with me just say so.
dont insult me. give me a reason why instead. seems no one can do that. use logic i mean.
criticising someone over grammar rather than content(on an internet forum of all places, oh **** i forgot to capitalize let me go back and type that in...yeah right...) is about as trivial as can be.
women nit pick.

now that that is behind us, thanks all who responded with realivant information.
(latest gmj).

 

[dawg23]

KShaft:

1. I am concerned about the possibility that you are suffering from paronia. I specifically complimented you on your grammatical skills, and then provided a few constructive remarks that might enable you to write even better. And you show your appreciation by accusing me of criticising (sic) you and insulting you. Sheeeesh.

2. I am intrigued by your alluding to having performed "intelligence" work for the government. Please forgive me if, based on your disjointed ramblings, I harbor some doubts about your qualifications to provide such services.

3. I am impressed by your statement that you could be more of an ass. I think I speak for quite a few of us when I say you've been an exceptional ass already.

4. Insofar serving my country, my military service speaks for itself. And I don't feel the need to enumerate all of the weapons I have fired just to inflate my sense of self worth.

5. I hope this is realivant (sic) information.

Stay safe,
Dawg23