Abstract:
It wasn't meant to be a legal analysis, since I am not (as I plainly stated in my post) a lawyer and therefore not competent to do a legal analysis.
It was meant as a distillation of a careful ordinary analysis based on:
1 - Florida Firearms Handbook, available in most gun shops and written by a criminal defense attorney with an interest in the subject;
2 - What the Florida Statutes say, and they are written in very plain language;
3 - What my both of my lawyers have told me.
The reason is was offered is that you appeared to be saying that defending yourself is not doing anything wrong, which it isn't. But context is important. You said this in the context, which is what the thread is about, of what to do after a shooting. One might read your remark and think "well, I didn't do anything wrong, so I have nothing to hide, so I'll just talk to the police and they'll understand".
That's a really dangerous line of thought if that is what you were implying. The police, upon arrival at the scene, have little real idea of what happened, but they are there to find out. They should be told by you what happened only in the presence of your lawyer.
The only person who mentioned "doing something wrong" being associated with self-defense was Samurai, who apparently is a lawyer, and he was using it as a COUNTER EXAMPLE, not suggesting that you would have, in the end, have done anything wrong.
---
It is MY interpretation, as a NON-LAWYER, from reading a whole lot of stuff, that when a person is killed by another person, a homicide has been committed. Period. Homi = person; cide = killed. It is my interpretation that if you committed this homicide in order to defend yourself against the commission of a "forcible felony", which are listed specifically in the statutes, that you have committed a "justifiable homicide" which, in my own terms, is a homicide against which you have a legal defense that will prevent your being convicted of it.
It WAS MY interpretation that, once you have convinced the criminal part of the justice system that the homicide was justifiable, that you could be sued but that you were immune from paying the resulting judgment, and that you would still be responsible for your civil legal defense costs. A careful reading of the statutes suggests it's better than that; you will not be responsible for ANY costs.
Samurai's remarks were exactly on the money.
If you think you "have done nothing wrong" and should yap away to the police, take a trip to
www.reid.com, then google "reid method interrogation" and see what you think about your ability to have a safe conversation with the police after a shooting and without a lawyer present. In particular, take a look at his partial list of customers. This guy and his partner wrote the book on effective interrogation.