Might as well add my opinion too. I carry a single action almost every day on the farm. It is a reliable firearm and a .45 or 44-40 is a potent round against almost anything I may encounter. When I go into town or the city, I carry something that holds more rounds and is quicker to reload. I have used SA revolvers for twenty five years and am more than capable of using one in a defensive role. But, God forbid, if I ever have to defend myself or my family, I want more than 5-6 rounds in a SA. I think it's amusing that a lot of folk that I have seen advocating for carrying a SA seem to believe they can't miss in a bad situation and that someone that carries a semi auto will only "spray and pray". You can miss with your "cowboy" gun too you know, while the guy with the Glock might not. Most lawmen, outlaws, cowboys and just about everyone else 140 years ago armed themselves with the most modern firearms they could afford. Most still do. I could carry a SA revolver for self defense, I could also carry a .22. Either would work in most situations. But for me, I would rather have more shots than I need, than need more than I have.
"This aint Dodge city, and you aint Bill Hickok."-Tom Selleck, Quigley Down Under.
"I'll bet you could almost get that fancy gun out of that fancy holster before some fast gentleman with an old fashioned sixgun blew a hole in you."- John Wayne Big Jake.
"This aint Dodge city, and you aint Bill Hickok."-Tom Selleck, Quigley Down Under.
Last edited: