It (TG) can be down loaded to well below the listing starting loads and still produce accuracy.
I have also loaded (TG) right up to the maximum listed loads without any noticeable problems.
the tight group had noticeably less recoil (than HS-6)
I'm sure that is because I'm at start load.
My question now is that such a bad thing?
Another thing to note is the barrel seemed to heat up quicker
is this due to the faster burn?
The tight group had noticeably less recoil, I'm sure that is because I'm at start load.
You can refer to my previous post#14 I have found that 3.7 grains of Titegroup works well with 115, 125, and 135 gr coated lead bullets. Don't know about you ,but I reload to save money so I work on loads that will use the least amount of powder that function the gun, have accuracy and stay within the safe guide lines.shot another 50 today @ 3.7gr accuary was great out of the berretta, not bad with the sccy (I blame the trigger). just for comparison I also shot some Winchester white box and my old load of 6.2gr hs6. The tight group had noticeably less recoil, I'm sure that is because I'm at start load. My question now is that such a bad thing? Another thing to note is the barrel seemed to heat up quicker, is this due to the faster burn?
Exactly! I use Titegroup for 9mm, .380 and .44-40.I'll elaborate: It's not true.
Like all propellants, TiteGroup has its "wheelhouse." A lot of loaders get nervy using TG; and putting in the small 9x19 case makes them even more nervy. Fair enough. All loaders have a right to like or not like any propellant.
TiteGroup is fast, spunky, hot burning, unforgiving, etc. Due to all those characteristics, it also tends to have a narrow load window. For some reason, that makes some loaders nervous. Fair enough. Myself, I alleviate this potential problem by staying within the charge weight window.
TiteGroup is also very dense, so it has a low fill rate. Even in the small 9mm case, a double-charge is possible. Some loaders choose propellants based on it not being able to double-charge. Fair enough. Myself, I use TG in 38 Special, and at my charge weights, five charges will fit in the case. I alleviate this potential problem by religiously checking the charge levels in the case before seating the bullet. Forsaking a propellant because of a potential double-charge is just silly IMO.
TiteGroup ignites easily, runs really clean, runs really consistent. It is extremely well suited for plated or jacketed bullets in the lighter range, running at "range practice" levels. To me, that sounds like an excellent choice for 115 grain bullets, in 9mm. And that would be because it IS well suited for 9mm in this type of application.
Originally Posted by Nick_C_S View Post
I'll elaborate: It's not true.
Like all propellants, TiteGroup has its "wheelhouse." A lot of loaders get nervy using TG; and putting in the small 9x19 case makes them even more nervy. Fair enough. All loaders have a right to like or not like any propellant.
TiteGroup is fast, spunky, hot burning, unforgiving, etc. Due to all those characteristics, it also tends to have a narrow load window. For some reason, that makes some loaders nervous. Fair enough. Myself, I alleviate this potential problem by staying within the charge weight window.
TiteGroup is also very dense, so it has a low fill rate. Even in the small 9mm case, a double-charge is possible. Some loaders choose propellants based on it not being able to double-charge. Fair enough. Myself, I use TG in 38 Special, and at my charge weights, five charges will fit in the case. I alleviate this potential problem by religiously checking the charge levels in the case before seating the bullet. Forsaking a propellant because of a potential double-charge is just silly IMO.