80% Lowers

Bill is correct. There is an older case, too, where a guy was caught making guns and if I recall, silencers, from scratch, and none were registered. He was sent up the creek. The guy had a nice shop, with mills, lathes, the works, and lost it all, including his freedom. It is not worth becoming a felon over.
 
The only items that the law says must be registered are NFA items.
Regular firearms can be made all day long- no registration or serial numbers required. You can't make guns for SALE, but you can sell guns you made.
 
Cheapshooter said:
...Sevens, what "Big" store?
I recently bought 2 stripped Anderson lowers for $40 each from Brownell. With $20 local FFL & shipping about $55 each. I think I could have bought up to 5 for the same FFL fee & shipping.

Just FYI
 
To the OP, if you are looking to save money on a lower, there are deals on finished stripped lowers to be found. No need to go the 80% route just to save money.

I frequently find lowers for $40-50 online here.

slickguns.com
 
Bill, the guy I was mentioning was caught manufacturing and selling them. The BATFE found out about the silencers, first, but later found, after their visit, that he was making firearms and selling to some undesirable folks, too. I can't remember if they were semi or full autos, but they were his design.

There was that stink about this and state law, a while back, about manufacturing and selling in state, but not out of state, because it had to do with interstate sales and the UCC. I think 1 or 2 states passed some new laws over it, allowing the manufacture and sales in state. It has been a while now, and I can't remember the details of it all.
 
Bill, the guy I was mentioning was caught manufacturing and selling them.

And THAT is the part that will land you a long stay in the Gray Bar Hotel. But I wasn't talking about finishing them, building guns from them, and choke, choke, choke.....selling:eek::eek::eek:them!!!

(note VVVVV)
 
If someone is buying a 80% lower off the internet, I think the government is not going to think you're using it as a paperweight.

The idea is pretty pointless for anonymity.
 
for those that have mentioned its cheaper to buy a serialized lower for $45 or so


at least where I live, you still have to pay $25 per lower for the paperwork fees, and at a store, or around $65 private ffl guy
and wait 10DAYS to pick up a stripped lower


or you can invest around $150 for a jig
$45-50 local pickup 80% lower and in a few hours with a drill press complete the lower

of course you will need to make maybe 7 lowers to pay for the jig over time
but there is no wait, no fees when building your own

so for some people its way more convenient
we dont have the luxury of buying 5 dirt cheap registered lowers and just let them sit around at some ffl shop
you have I think 30 days to start the paperwork, pay the fees and wait 10 days to pick up


where I can have a dozen 80% laying around waiting to be milled out at my leisure
and im sure the more you do, the better you get at it

I could care less about serial number
its the 10 day wait that really -CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED--CENSORED- me off they call it a cool off wait

like I could do anything with a stripped lower:confused::confused:
 
Last edited:
"If someone is buying a 80% lower off the internet, I think the government is not going to think you're using it as a paperweight.

The idea is pretty pointless for anonymity."

Please tell us how the government would know you bought it in the first place.
80% receivers are not guns. There is no regulation on them. What if you actually wanted it for a paper weight?
 
If someone is buying a 80% lower off the internet, I think the government is not going to think you're using it as a paperweight.

The idea is pretty pointless for anonymity.

this is like the third post in this thread to repeat this stupidity. Could the government find out who the customers are at an 80% lower website? sure it's possible, just look at Ares Armor. What did that take for the government to retrieve a consumer list? lots of lawyering, law interpretation, warrants and a large swat style raid. So what did the government get out of all that? I have no freaking idea. I know my first 80% lower was a Christmas present from my stepfather living 3 states away, shipped to his home and taken back to my house by car, please tell me at what point I lost my anonymity? is this the case for most buyers, not likely. but how many companies are selling 80% lowers and even raw forgings that have NOT been raided and customer records seized? well, just about every single 80% company that exists that isn't Ares Armor. where on the internet are you guys being brainwashed into believing this crap. The all-mighty government can't keep track of the artillery we drop off to frenemies all over the world, much less where every block of polymer or aluminum is being shipped an turned into a working rifle, with no registration or laws requiring such. There are 2 LGS's in my small town that sells them over-the-counter, even using scary CASH if you so desire. I had no idea just how good the feds are apparently, tracking plastic blocks sold OTC w/ cash, they are really clever. and who is wearing the tin-foil exactly??

but, I didn't do this for the "ghost" gun aspect, although it's kind of a cool conversation piece and I fully believe that the more people that take the 2nd amendment into their own hands and skirt the requirements of the feds to exercise their rights, will make the gun community stronger and more laws harder to pass. how great would it be if every home had a couple firearms that never had a serial number logged into a system somewhere, that'd really make the passage of registries and other "common-sense" laws very difficult to impose. I made 80% lowers because it was fun, and it taught me a new skill that is another side of my favorite hobby. when you gain the knowledge to build a firearm with your own sweat/blood/curses and tools, it's one more step towards mastery of a given trade. this didn't make me an expert, but I gained a much deeper understanding of the platform. I hope to build a 1911 one day as well, even though it's likely not going to be a big money saving endeavor.

it's unfortunate that the cost savings isn't there, it makes sense that it would be. less burdensome controls on the manufacturer like licensing, paperwork, lawyers, inspections and so many other expensive and consuming aspects of becoming a true "firearms manufacturer". I guess the volume of sales just isn't there to yield a profit selling the 80's at under 50$. the saving could be a big factor when looking at AR308 lowers though. generally the 80% companies are selling 308 kits for just a few extra dollars over the ar15 kits. when I finally do dip my toes into the ar10 waters, I very well may start with an 80%'er. if only I could find a cheaper alternative to all this tin-foil, I'd be well on my way already.
 
Gunplummer;
"Do you buy 80% beer kits and just finish the last little bit?"
Uh, yes, that's basically what an extract kit is. It's also very commonly used by homebrewers because you don't need a 10-gallon mash pot and propane burner, or extremely expensive kegging apparatus.

Pretty much the exact same motivation behind builders wishing to complete an 80% with its much more modest tooling & facility requirements than a billet or forging project. People can still get their hands dirty running drill presses or routers, still make a project who's success still rests on their skill and attention to detail. Believe it or not, this can be a pretty steep and fulfilling project for a generation that has never had to learn to use calipers or tools. Most high schools haven't had a shop class for decades.

I know 80% skeptics have this vision of all builders tossing their lowers into a CNC as an affront to the man, but the truth is they either A) never get built, B) get ruined a time or two before success, or C) are completed with a lot of handwork and measurement which is still required when jigs are employed. CNC mills simply aren't that common, and even then, getting the thing set up, trammed, indicated, and running properly through the toolpath (expect to scrap at least twice as many lowers doing CNC the first time as manual) is just about as big a project as a crummy router build. Budget rat-rodders vs Porsche tuners.

Frankenmauser;
"I have picked up finished lowers for as little as $34 apiece."
Not directed at you but rather the skeptics, but it's like people have no memory at all, isn't it? 80%'s took off when there were no lowers at all, and factories found they could sort of satisfy market demand by punching out product that skipped some of the most critical and red-tape-laden steps. Years back, 0% forgings went for a handful of dollars, yet today they have appreciated greatly; all the more if the owner was able to process them further along, or even build them out into complete guns for himself (saving him from needing to buy complete firearms going forward). The reason 80%'s have lost their cost edge, is simply because the shortage is over; another panic (like next year :rolleyes:) and companies will once again omit the whole ATF/Firearm side of the process to increase production and hold prices down.

"I just wanted something to 'play' with; and wanted to see if a ratty, cheap, bench-top Chinese drill press and a nearly-dead (probably counterfeit) "Dremel" could get the job done with no jig."
Precisely. It's a very instructive exercise all around. Sort of like those black-pipe shotguns that seem to be all the rage, only less stupid/dangerous.

"Pride. Satisfaction. Knowledge of the equipment. ...And no one to blame, but yourself, if something goes wrong."
This guy gets it. BTW, how often do we hear of factory AR's being 'off spec' or whatever, and blamed for bad performance..? ;)

"There is absolutely NOTHING illegal about building your own gun.
Where do you guys get this stuff?"
Up North, it seems.

Gunplummer;
"If you want to "make" your own lower, buy a block of 7075 and have at it. Don't try to make completing an 80% AR lower more than it is. I don't doubt a lot of people on this forum could start with a block of wood and make one. I just saw the post above. No, it is not illegal. But it is a long way from "Building" anything. Makes one wonder why people don't start with a black powder revolver kit. A little much , I guess."
Well, it's darn sure not merely 'assembling' a lower/gun, so what would you call it? I see you're from PA, home to America's industrial machining might at one point (often still is), so I can see why you'd look down on amateurs if you are a professional machinist, or something, but your comment is snobbish. Milling the FCG pocket requires indicating, measuring, cutting straight, drilling straight, and inspecting the final product for the project to complete successfully; how is that not machinework/building? Would you consider starting from a 0% forging a 'build,' seeing as you need a jig/fixture to hold the funky-shaped thing? Ironically, there's a "Gunplumber" out there who's a veritable champion of the amateur gun building hobby you look down upon.

"If someone is buying a 80% lower off the internet, I think the government is not going to think you're using it as a paperweight."
Ironically, that's exactly what most become. Either the buyer never gets around to it, or botches the job because they are learning.

The other flip side to this whole issue are the "80%'s" out there for other firearms. Notably, 1911's which enable one to build a competitor to Wilson for pennies on the dollar should you exhibit the skill required, and STEN type tube guns, whose "80%" is literally a section of conduit cut to length. As vibrant and well-served as the AR market is anymore, there no real need for the homebrew niche, like there was as recently as last year (and next year), but guess what? Some people who were reduced to such desperate measures found they actually liked the hobby :confused:

TCB
 
Maybe you should lay off the home brew, I am not the one that posted that. The main market target of 80% AR lowers was and always will be people that want something "Unregistered". What are you going to do when it is done, paint it? Why don't you start with an 80% wooden stock (Any gun will do), fit it and checker it, and then finish it off. It takes a lot more skill and then you will have something to be proud of when you are done.
 
I don't think any government agency is tracking who is buying 80% lower receivers. First, it's not illegal to buy them, second, it's not illegal to finish them, Third, the government is prohibited from keeping lists of who owns what firearms. Fourth, the IRS has lost a huge number of employees - assuming this is true, do you really think the government is cutting back IRS staff to fund a bunch of grunts to keep track of 80% lower receivers???

Think about this: The government doesn't even track the production of 5 Watt (not mw) handheld lasers! On the chart of which they should be more concerned about, 5 watt handheld lasers is probably a 5 out of 10, while 80% receivers are maybe a .05. They might as well track people purchasing barrel blanks.

So, buy your 80% receivers and silencer kits (oh, I mean solvent traps) - just don't do anything illegal with them and nobody cares. Guns are old school. I wouldn't be surprised to read about a 500 Watt handheld laser in the next 7 years.
 
Last edited:
skans said:
just don't do anything illegal with them and nobody cares.

Until the ATF makes an arbitrary rule change of what constitutes an 80% lower, kind of like reclassifying the Streetsweeper shotguns as destructive devices and requiring their registration back in 2001. One day it was a shotgun, the next day it was no different than an illegal machine gun.

https://www.atf.gov/file/83656/download

Then the ATF will go in and get the manufacturer's sales records like they did for the ARES 80% lowers. So buy your 80% lowers with cash from a local source so there's no record.

http://fox5sandiego.com/2014/03/17/feds-raid-gun-parts-stores-despite-court-order/

SAN DIEGO – With a search warrant in hand, federal agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives confiscated computers, customer lists and the questionable polymer 80 percent lower receivers from four Ares Armor store locations throughout San Diego County over the weekend.
 
the $39ea when buying 5 or more bandwagon the last time they offered it
I think you will find the $39 ones recently offered are actually out of spec. One of the threaded holes is only threaded 3/4 instead of 1". That is what I found when they were locally advertised. There are a ton of them on the market now.
 
So, for some unknown reason, 80% lowers are machined much better than the finished receivers?
Come on, now... he said nothing of the sort.

All he said is that he is aware of at least one run of cheap lower receivers that were out of spec.
 
Maybe you should lay off the home brew, I am not the one that posted that. The main market target of 80% AR lowers was and always will be people that want something "Unregistered". What are you going to do when it is done, paint it? Why don't you start with an 80% wooden stock (Any gun will do), fit it and checker it, and then finish it off. It takes a lot more skill and then you will have something to be proud of when you are done.

So, what quoted text did you not write, this time? There are partially-inletted stocks also, which many complete for personal pleasure, to learn a skill, or to save money. But carving and finishing a stock (let alone checkering) is actually fairly advanced, and requires more tools than a beginner's machine operation. Heck, roughing out a stock requires very little skill, compared to finishing a stock. Checkering (well, decent checkering) is probably the hardest skill in stockmaking. Baby steps. Cutting a stock down is more comparable, and --surprise-- plenty of folks opt to do so themselves rather than pay for it.

Is it the fact the AR FCG isn't 'artistic' enough why you don't feel it worthy of anyone's time, or the fact it results in an 'unregistered' 'firearm?' How much work do you feel someone should have to put in before they should be recognized as a hobbyist gunbuilder, rather than some shady dodger? You're talking hundreds of hours for a billet or Jack Squat (sheet metal weld-up) build unless the maker is experienced or 'cheating' with CNC tools*. Nobody less antigun than the ATF itself drew the line where it is, because they could not convincingly claim the item did not require substantial work to be completed.

Does an AK flat build qualify, or an HK 'semi-flat,' since they're actually easier than an AR if you only have a drill press to 'mill' with?

TCB

*CNC is hardly a cake walk, even when things 'work,' stuff happens often enough to botch or complicate a job for a small time machinist
 
FrankenMauser, he said exactly that. All I hear is CNC this, CNC that. I doubt the original receivers were even cut on NC tape machines. I don't know how I get roped into these usless discussions. You are all correct. Put your little "Rifle builds" together like the 6 year olds did with tinker toys years ago.
 
"All I hear is CNC this, CNC that"
Mill; $1000
CNC conversion; $1000
Setup/debugging; 40+ hours
Lower blank; 30$
That's about as cheap as you can get it.

Yeah, just like tinker toys. BTW, for those lucky few who have both means and skill to utilize CNC, milling from billet is about as difficult as an 80% --actually easier since no jigs may be required ("billet" was largely invented as a way around expensive forgings during the shortage). The only thing easier is the cleanup and reduced number of setups. Despite the frantic media, hardly anyone has access to CNC; it is much more expensive and finnicky to learn than manual machining.

You clearly look down on the activity; whatever, that's just like, your opinion, man. I'm more curious what you would rather have people do? Doing 'real' smithy work requires lathe more than mill, and a largish one at that, and there's no way in heck anyone's diving into that barrel of monkeys unless it will be earning them dinner. Too much money. I know I wouldn't have, had I not had the good fortune to meet a friend with a modest shop to learn some basics in. Hobbyists can't/don't jump in full time; a fact that some professionals can't quite wrap their heads around sometimes.

TCB
 
Back
Top