Also, bear in mind that while certainly an issue that should be considered, overpenetration is not nearly the bogeyman it has been hyped up to be. Many police departments beat the drum long and hard about overpenetration in order to justify the use of then-politically-incorrect hollowpoint ammunition. The NYPD is a prime example of this as they finally got to carry JHP bullets in 1998 by tabulating the number of officers shot with overpenetrating FMJ bullets fired by their partners. Most of the documented cases of peopole being injured or killed by overpenetrating bullets that I've come across either involved non-expanding bullets like FMJ or LRN or very dated JHP bullets which failed to expand and thus acted like FMJ. Finally, as has already been mentioned, the bullets sailing through the air unimpeded because they missed their intended target all together are far more dangerous than one which penetrates through and through. ]
Are you saying that a 9MM hollow pint has the same lethality as a 9MM fmj? I have personally seen the firearms discharge report on the Diallo shooting. It specifically states the fmj round the officers were using contributed to the amount of shots fired, due to Diallo not going down and the rounds that passed through him ricochetting BACK at the officers. The job had been trying to go to hollow points for years, but the usual anti-cop rabble rousers protested it. In spite of that, the job could no longer issue fmj ammo after the Diallo shooting. 2 of the 4 officers had Combat Crosses, meaning they had been in shootouts before, so these guys weren't poorply trained, trigger happy boobs
17 shots at a range of less than 5 yards and he would have lived.
That doesn't answer my question. Show me evidence that if hollow points were used that the outcome would have different. As for him not going down people can be shot numerous times with handgun ammo and not go down. If they want to have a better change of putting someone down then they should be using a rifle.
. Cops aren't carrying rifles. They have handguns.
Most departments have moved from the 9MM to the .40 or the .45 GAP. Show me evidence those calibers are better.
As to penetration of a light hollow point v a heavy hollow point:Biff Tannen
.357 self-defense: light vs heavy and safety of bystanders
- One popular theory of .357 self-defense is that one should use a light hollow-point (125 grain)... The logic is that the light bullet will expand easily and the energy will transfer into the target, and prevent an exit, which may hurt an innocent bystander.
- a second popular theory of .357 self-defense is that one should use a heavy hollow-point (158 grain)... The logic is that the heavy bullet will have less energy therefore less potential to exit the target, this preventing an exit which may hurt an innocent bystander.
In your opinion, which self-defense theory is more valid?
Man, I get tired of hearing this. Anyone who’s had experience with FOF training, much less actual gunfighting knows that accurate shot placement on an opponent who’s moving and shooting at you while you’re moving is damn near impossible.Its still a matter of shot placement.
Man, I get tired of hearing this. Anyone who’s had experience with FOF training, much less actual gunfighting knows that accurate shot placement on an opponent who’s moving and shooting at you while you’re moving is damn near impossible.