.308 Win 220gr vs. 175gr SMK for Long Range Target

Thanks hounddawg,

From the article:

In the F-TR class, two men, Ray Gross (Team McMillan) and Mike Plunkett, both set a new pending 1000-yard record with a 200-16X score.

Ray, along with the vast majority of other F-TR competitors, was shooting a .308 Win. His load included Berger 220X bullets, in Lapua brass, with Vihtavuori N140 powder and CCI 450 bullet. Ray’s rifle features a 28″ Bartlein Heavy Palma barrel, mated to a Kelbly Panda action in McMillan stock. Up front was a Phoenix bipod with lowering bracket. The scope was a Nightforce NXS 8-32x56mm.
 
Last edited:
Pathfinder45 said:
If there's a moral to this story, I'd say that you really can't make a 30-'06 out of a 308. If you want 30-'06 performance, go buy one. On the other hand, you can certainly down-load the '06.....
Click to expand...
The reason 308's are favored over the 30-06 for long range target shooting is their 30+% smaller test groups is worth a 4% increase in wind drift caused by 100 fps lower muzzle velocity. That began back in the early 1960's.

You can add 4 inches to 308 barrel lengths to shoot at 30-06 velocities.
 
And .308 is all you get for Palma and F/T-R. Unless you want to really stretch a .223 which I chased without much success for a while.
 
A 220 is too long for the .308 Win.
Use a 175 or 178 grain match bullet for distances past 600 yards. Both will use the same data. Three grains won't matter.
A 190 is really best for .300 Win Mag match rifles. Knew a guy who regularly won DCRA(our version of the NRA but without the political clout) 1,000 yard 'sniper' matches. The Win M70A receivered rifle weighed 17.5 pounds. It's original stock lives on my .243 deer rifle.
"...all you get for Palma..." Or .223, but it's a 155 grain bullet only in .308 Palma. And the rifles weigh in at 14 or 15 pounds and are single shots.
F-T/R is .223 or .308 only with a max rifle weight of 18 pounds. Bipods and adjustable rests are allowed.
F Class is a totally different game. It's basically any rifle, any sights, any caliber .35 and under. One of the many such games available.
There's something for everybody so try as many as you can before spending a pile of money.
"..."If it doesn't have a copyright notice, it's not copyrighted."..." Be really interesting to watch that trial. Traffic court would still be way more entertaining and it's free. Much better if you're not there at the request of the Crown or State though.
1,000px × 1,110px is too big anyway.
 
"This means the gyroscopic stability factor increases as the bullet goes downrange. That's what was vexing Stoner. The M16 rounds tumbled just fine when they hit a target up close, but far enough away they were they settled out and would just make pencil holes. He was trying to get them to tumble further out."

Find this very interesting, although for a slightly different subject.
 
Eugene Stoner would have disagreed with Berger's number. He wanted the military to go from a 12" twist in the M16 to a 14" twist to get the stability factor down nearer to 1.
Click to expand...

Does this mean that the history I read which said that the M16 started out with the 14 twist varmint barrel and was increased to 12 to stabilize the FMJ boattail in cold dense air was wrong? (As Jeff Cooper said of another gun, rumor has it that it gets cold in Russia.)

I have variously read that the wounding mechanism was "tumbling" or a one-time yaw turnover or the bullet breaking in two at the cannelure. And that the standardization of a 14 inch barrel has done more to reduce velocity dependent effects than changes in rifling pitch.
 
The 185gr Berger will serve with distinction; and is mag-length capable (from what I understand).

I have 168gr SMK and Nosler BTHP; not like I'm trying to get the last 50yd capablity. And they work...
 
You really need to think about what you are trying to do with a rifle and load.

For target work at known distance, the 220 SMK from a 308 is a fine option. The additional drop at 1k yards is irrelevant since the known distance ensures that you won't see vertical dispersion problems caused by distance estimation errors, and the 1.4 MOA advantage in wind drift for standard 10mph 90 degree cross wind will help you stay in the ten ring.

For tactical work, it's the opposite. The 175gr SMK has 3.6 minutes less drop at 1k (that's about 36 inches), which on a torso sized target is pretty significant. That makes it easier for a sniper or dedicated marksman to use holdover/under stadia lines on a scope reticle (smaller holds are generally better, keeping the target closer to the optical center of the scope).

The 220 SMK load is dropping 79 inches between 800 and 900, and 98 inches from 900 to 1k. The 175 is dropping 74 and 90 across the same distance. I know that 5 inches and 8 inches doesn't seem too significant, but the average human torso length is between 17 and 21 inches, that additional 5 to 8 inches of less vertical drop becomes helpful in making distance errors less of a factor for success of a shot where you might only get one chance. It's about a 25% advantage when you run the numbers.

So this is why the 175 SMK has survived as the DOD's projectile for sniper ammunition, despite other options doing better on the competition line. It performs equally well through bolt and gas guns, has a tangent ogive making it very jump tolerant.

If you run the numbers for across the course high power (200, 300, 600 yards) it's clear that the 175 SMK is probably the better choice for most shooters (faster action time and less recoil, minimal difference in ballistics).

So I hope this provides some context about how a dedicated target rifle shooting known distance for score across a string of shots is just different from a tactical rifle shooting unknown distance only going to take one or two shots.
 
Even for tactical situations wind drift is much more of an unknown than range. Reticle ranging will get you close enough that wind drift becomes the dominant factor. In most sniping situations you can laser range find, especially if the sniper gets into position before the target arrives.
 
...and assuming the target decides to stand exactly at the spot you pre-ranged. But I suspect there are more than just trajectory ballistics involved in the choice. The new 6.5 Creedmoor SOCOM sniping rifles were selected in part because the snipers they tested it with got a significantly higher 1000 meter hit percentage with them over the .308 sniper systems. More recoil increases the recoil moments that set up barrel vibration so it can produce an undesirable accuracy influence. The military doesn't get to tune loads to the individual rifle.
 
Unclenick said:
...and assuming the target decides to stand exactly at the spot you pre-ranged. But I suspect there are more than just trajectory ballistics involved in the choice. The new 6.5 Creedmoor SOCOM sniping rifles were selected in part because the snipers they tested it with got a significantly higher 1000 meter hit percentage with them over the .308 sniper systems. More recoil increases the recoil moments that set up barrel vibration so it can produce an undesirable accuracy influence. The military doesn't get to tune loads to the individual rifle.
Click to expand...
If those military sniper rifle barrels are all the same profile and free floated, they'll all have the same vibration frequencies and amplitude. If their stocks are all the same, they'll all shoot the same load equally accurate. Each cartridge version could have its own barrel and stock shapes.

However, the 7.62 versions have more recoil during barrel time so they're harder to shoot as accurate as 6.5 versions shooting lighter weight bullets producing less recoil.

It would help to know what each versions accuracy tests were. If both tested equally accurate, then tests with field positions would be valid.
 
Last edited:
I don't know how closely the all-else-being equal applies. Boots Obermeyer developed the 5R rifling and made the barrels for the M24 system for awhile, but then someone else got the contract, so I don't know if that introduced any subtle differences. The M40 is based on a Remington action like the M24, but doesn't use the 5R barrels. Indeed, its barrels and their sources have changed with the different version upgrades. The stock is different.

The 6.5 CM seems to be being adopted as a new medium cartridge. If you search for military articles it looks like a sniper system, an assault rifle, and a machine gun have all been selected to use it.
 
A 220 is too long for the .308 Win.
Click to expand...

I would say this is true if your COAL is 2.800 . I however am shooting/testing the Berger 200-x gr bullet now and my COAL is something like 2.925 . The fact the bullet tip is so long .

Here it is compared to a 168gr smk
TYzXgp.jpg


At a 2.925 COAL the cartridge is to long to clear my ejection port if I try to eject the round with out firing it and obviously must be hand fed into the action . So does that make it to long for a 308 ? I say no but think it's reasonable for others to say it is . It depends on if your pro's out weigh your cons .

The interesting thing about this 200gr Hybrid bullet is that it's baring surface is somewhat short for it's length . Resulting in the ability to get it down the bore quite quickly for it's weight .

Left to right - 175gr tmk , 195gr ELD , 200gr Berger , 190gr smk , 175gr smk

pPNXVI.jpg


As UN points out the heavy for cartridge bullet does seem to take a bit more tuning to get right and that's where I'm at right now with these bullets .
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top