.243 Win bullets deflecting after impact

243....What I have noticed is an occasional case of the bullet deflecting after hitting bone and traveling through the animal lengthwise

Thats not unique with the 243, it happens with other guns as well. Though I've never had it happen with a 243, I have had it happen with a 30'06 on antelope and a 7mm Rem Mag (Nosler) on Caribou.

Its not the bullet or the gun, it just falls under the category of "poop happens". It could be a tiny fraction of the angle it hit.

I've told the story before, of shooting a buffalo in the head with a 357 LSWC, two bullets, a smidgen a part, one bounced off and one killed the buffalo.

I wouldn't let a freak happening defer you from using a great round.
 
Thanks Kraigwy. I surely will not hesitate to use the .243 for deer or other game. Just that since I started hand loading and doing more hunting and target shooting again after the kids are grown and gone, I have become really interested in ballistics, and terminal ballistics. Lots of interesting things to ponder with the wide variety of bullets for various purposes and especially the different materials and design in hunting bullets. Ranges from relatively light non lead bullets which use high velocity to deliver energy to the target to on the other end the heavy soft nose jacketed lead bullet which relies on mass and expansion to do the job. Have enjoyed reading your expertise on the forum for some time now.
 
What I have noticed is an occasional case of the bullet deflecting after hitting bone and traveling through the animal lengthwise.
Yes, the laws of physics still apply to bullets, even if they are .243" in diameter. Study up on vectors and you will have your answer as to why.
 
ARCH 308, as I tried to state but worded improperly apparently is my observations of decades of hunting. What I called uninterested hunters, was NOT a condemnation of hunters uninterested in terminal ballistic, it is difficult to discuss terminal ballistics with someone uninterested in these matters. I have spent years gutting and skinning big game animal, and even autopying long dead and abandoned stinking, bloated animals in an effort to find out how bullets performed. This has just be a thing of intrest for me. I am not condemming anyone who does not share this interest. A fellow guide I became friends with has FAR more experence and knowledge than I. yet he has zero interest in terminal ballistics and after a season of guiding, he has not a clue what bullet a client used, where the bullet impacted, what the penatration was, how much the bullet weighted after it was recovered or any other matter concerning terminal ballistics. When asked his opinion on bullets he just shruggs his shoulders and asks who cares. He personally shot a huge bull elk last year. When I asked what ammo he used, all he could remember was he thinks it came in a green box. And has no idea the bullet weight. When asked how it performed he siad he had a long trailing job. Not much useful imformation can be derived from such imformation, yet this man is a superb guide. As for what incadence means, my poor education is rearing its ugly head. I went to a one room school in my formative years, what I meant to say was incidence. As to what caliber someone uses, I care not as long as the animal suffers as little as possible. It is difficult to discuss bullet performance with many whitetail hunters as many whitetails are shot broadside and are realitively small animals, thus few bullets are recovered and little resistance is met. I have shot completely through the lung cavity of a large mule deer with a heavy winter coat using a 380 ACP and expanding bullets. Not much can be derived from this experement without recovered bullets. I hope my rambling has cleared the air, somewhat.
 
Yes, I have to agree with the others, it just happens. I used to have a 6.5x 50 Arisaka that would occasionally do that. I actually recovered a bullet that had not opened up correctly and about a 1/4 of the front of a bullet was bent to the side. I had to put another bullet in that deer because the bent one did not even seem to affect it. I thought I had missed. I was loading Sierra 6.5 140 Gr. SP and that was the only rifle I noticed it on.
 
Back
Top