.22 LR Match rifle

You can find Kimber 82G rifles for about $600.00. They are excellent match target rifles with very good match aperture sights front & rear. With a little work such as re-crowning their barrel and glass bedding the stocks, then a little trigger polishing and adjustment to about 8 oz. you will have an excellent target rifle good enough to get you to the top end of smallbore prone Expert (99.4% and below) Mine liked Eley black box and got me to the top end of Expert.
From there on, you need the quality and precision of an Annie. You can go to the Kimber section of Rimfire central ( http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19 ) to learn more.
 
This is not a difficult question. Older match 22 LR's will shoot. They will shoot very darn well. I just returned from the Small Bore Prone NRA Nationals and as I love older rifles, I got to look at the rifles and actions around me. One shooter, he was using a stock box M52E. He bought it new in 1981, it was new old stock when he purchased it. I watched him shoot a 99-9X clean at 100 yards with the thing, the wind caught the last shot and blew it out to a nine.

That rifle is a very accurate rifle. The E model is basically the D model but with a light, like 11 ounce, trigger.

Another shooter was using a Rem M37 in a 50's Fajen stock and doing rather well with it. The lady next to me was using a M52 action in an Anschutz prone stock. I am of the opinion that had Winchester put that action in an advanced stock and improved the trigger pull the M52 would be common on the firing line.

The primary limitations with old match rifles are the triggers and ergonomic adjustments. The Army mandated trigger pulls and stock configurations that were close to service rifle specifications, which at the time was a Garand or a pistol grip M1903. Prior to 1968 the Army had the big vote on the rules committee and the Army viewed competitive shooting as a training ground for future recruits. The rifles of the era reflect these limitations. Triggers were required to be 3 pounds and the stocks had fixed buttplates and cheek pieces. But Army shooters were getting their butt's kicked in international competition, primarily from Soviet block, and so the rifle rules were relaxed around 1967/1968 when the Army stopped supporting the National Matches. Unfortunately that was about the time Remington, Winchester dropped their small bore target rifle lines.

Triggers on the older rifles can be adjusted down, but generally they start to follow if adjusted to 2.5 pounds. This is important as it takes a lot more work to shoot accurately prone, with a heavy trigger. When I started this game I thought a 1.5 lb trigger was too light, now I am using the set trigger on my Anschutz, which is in ounces, and loving it. I can see the effects on target of a jarring trigger pull, it takes more work to stay in the ten ring with a heavy (and I mean 1.0 pound or more) trigger.

I don't feel very handicapped using a scope on the older rifles, but I much prefer the adjustable cheekpieces and buttplates found on Anschutz rifles. Mind you, I am shooting a 1976 dated Anschutz and shooting it well. Stock adjustments make a big difference, more so for me when shooting a scope. I can adjust the thing so my face stays in the exact same position. For me, this is the most critical when using irons. It is of course just as critical when using a scope but maybe the scope bell helps me center my face each time.

Hand stops on older, say WW2 era rifles, were way the heck up the stock and you could not move them back. No one shoots in that low of a position any more. Not having your support hand against the handstop will really hurt your score. The rifle must not slide in the hand under recoil. I had to put ladder tape behind the handstop and underneath the forearm on this M37. I was not going to alter a vintage stock rifle stock, but I needed a grippy surface since I could not contact the front swivel. Shooting this rifle well with a sling is tough as there is no handstop against which to accurately locate the support hand.



This rifle will shoot well, this is a 400-32X that I shot in competition at 100 yards. I won the 100 yard match that day with these targets.



If you can find an affordable M52D, or better, a M52E, that would be a great rifle. I am of the opinion that the H&R M12 is an excellent target rifle, actually a product improved M52. With a scope I have shot some outstanding groups and scores with mine. Still, it has the heavy trigger of the era.






For the money, the CMP Kimbers are still a best buy. I managed to scope this Kimber and took it out for testing in May. It will clean the target out to 100. This target I put together to show the effect of a drop out. For some horrible reason my particular lot of Eley Club provides an abnormal number of low velocity shots which go into the eight ring at 6 0'C




I have a Rem M513, stiff trigger and cheap plastic magazine, but it shoots very well.
 
Hard to beat an Anschutz 54 series for competition. I shot an Anschutz Match Mod. 1807 when I use to shoot ISU. They are extremely accurate.

There is an un-complete gun on the CMP Auction sight now. It needs a trigger and sights. Both easy to find.

Its an AMU gun so you can pretty much be sure its a shooter. Right now the bid is $26 but it will go up, just how much I don't know.

http://cmpauction.thecmp.org/catalog.asp?catid=368&n=22-Cal-Rifles

I'd jump on it but I still have my 1807.

Another option since when you can find a Winchester 52, it will be pricy is the H&R Model 9 or 5200. Model 9 is the military version, the 5200 is the civilian version with a better finish on the stock.

I got the 5200 when they first came out, they are every bit as good as the 52 Winchesters except for the name.

When I was running the AK NG Marksmanship unit we had Win. 52s but not enough. They were no longer in the system so I ordered a bunch of H&R. Besides the state team I ordered 10 each for BN and separate companies. I've shoot both, same with my other team members. The H&Rs held their own against the Winchesters.

This is my H&R with a Remington 24X scope. I had no problem cleaning the 50 Meter Targets in the English (prone) match.

HandR5200_1.jpg


My Anschutz Match Mod. 1807 will out shoot it but the Anschutz was more picky about what match ammo it uses.

If you want a Light rifle, then as mention you'll find the CZ 452 hard to beat.

The CMP GSM Master Instructor Course is designed for the 22 Sporting Rifle as well and surplus military rifles. I hadn't had that much experience in the light rifle competition rifles so I inquired from my classmates what was the best 22 for the CMP sporting rifle matches (NRA Light Rifle). With out exception they told me the CZ 452.

I got one when I got home and except for the light weight, its quite the target rifle. Mine don't seem as picky about ammo as the 1807 but again I haven't shot it at ISU targets to compare. I pretty sure the lighter weight will get me before the ammo.
 
Cheap, Contrarian, and Competitive.......Pick 2. You cannot pick 3.



Your best bet if you want to be different is to find an old Winchester 52D. If you start fooling around with some oddballs, you'll be above the price of a new or lightly used Annie very quickly, and you'll spend a lot of time watching others shoot.
 
I should emphasize that I do shoot a CZ 452 in the sporter competition. For this game, that means open sights, no aperture, no sling, no jacket. Mine is completely stock, but I am going to try a Rifle Basix trigger this Fall. That rifle will certainly shoot better than me, if only because of vision and sight limits. With a scope it shows its stuff.
 
With a scope it shows its stuff.

When I first got my 452, I took it to the range and shot it with the irons and all kinds of ammo except good stuff.

I was just blown away with the registration of the iron sights. They were just phenomenal. Just dial them to two hundred and bang the gong. That is when I knew I had a winner.

Did not like the way CZ rings attached to the rail on the rifle and looked around and found a picatinney rail to fit the CZ dovetail and scoped the rifle. I had a trigger job and bedded the action and relieved the barrel so it floats. The trigger is about 2.5-3 lbs which is heavy compared to the Annie which is set about 10 ounces.

If I do my part with decent ammo from Lapua, Norma, RWS etc. it will shoot with the Annie at 50 yards. I don't have enough scope on it to test at 100 yards. I have a 2-7 Nikon on the CZ and a 8.5-25 Leupold VXIII on the Annie.

I have put a Nightforce 8-32 on the CZ just to fool around and it just looks terrible and makes the rifle very top heavy so I am back to the Nikon.

I think the rail on the rifle is from Weigand but am not sure. The picatinney rail really makes it easy to swap scopes from rifle to rifle and lock them down securely.
 
Back
Top