I don't own a closet full of any one brand 22. I do have a weatherby xxii, ruger American, cz 453, savage/anschutz 64 match, anschutz 64 sporter, anschutz match 54.
My Cz 453 and Anschutz sporter (64 action) both shoot about 1/2" at 50 with match ammo. The Ruger and xxii not quite as good. All keepers.
The savage mark 10 (another 64 action), heavy match gun shot 1/2" at 50 with cci std velocity and not been tested more. Due to getting the next gun. The SA is for offhand practice with aperture site. I just mounted a used scope to checkout that scope.
The match 54 Anschutz is another even heavier gun from 1971 that shows a lot of use. That gun cut my groups immediately in half with wolf match ammo. It is a different class. I only scratch the surface with this recent acquisition.
The thing about shooting the match 54, is I am not all worried. Is my hold consistent? Where is the voodoo black magic?. I just sight and squeeze... drill the target. This gun actually makes me look good. I know I am just a hack in the over all world of shooting. Yet, I do know, I have something special.
Anchutz does pretty well in the Olympics. I have not heard of any cz guns in those events. We can buy the same models as the Olympic shooters (minus the tweeks and coaching) and dream. Shoot and dream. Declare bankruptcy and dream. That is not the question, dollars. The question is precision.
CZ has a lot of models but it is basically all cosmetic. The Anschutz line is far deeper from bench, to biathlon and everything in between. Hunting, silhouette, novice to Olympian. Deep is also, "Not the question".