That looks very cool--but I don't understand what you mean by this?does the actual calculations in real time rather than just using the LBR calculations.
Got it--I used to program database-driven websites so I understand the linking of mathematical formulas as data checks and populators of cells.It's not "real time" as in when you are shooting, as the data and the Labradar's stat calculations are coming off the memory card after the shooting session is done. What he means is that, rather than being stuck with the stats the Labradar recorded on the card, he set Excel up to calculate the same stats directly from the velocity data, so that if you alter a piece of data the whole sheet recalculates the stats on the fly (Excel's normal mode of operation, though you can also force a recalculation any time with the F9 key). This allows him to identify erroneous data and eliminate it and get automatically updated stats that are correct for the remaining data only, and that no longer include the error.
It's not "real time" as in when you are shooting, as the data and the Labradar's stat calculations are coming off the memory card after the shooting session is done. What he means is that, rather than being stuck with the stats the Labradar recorded on the card, he set Excel up to calculate the same stats directly from the velocity data, so that if you alter a piece of data the whole sheet recalculates the stats on the fly (Excel's normal mode of operation, though you can also force a recalculation any time with the F9 key). This allows him to identify erroneous data and eliminate it and get automatically updated stats that are correct for the remaining data only, and that no longer include the error.
I've only had the unit out a few times--so I'm hardly an expert, but I would say that's accurate--assuming the muzzle blast mostly goes to the front. The power of the cartridge has some role as well. It sounds a bit counter-intuitive, according to one of their engineers you may need some distance from the muzzle to the unit in order to get a clear impulse to trigger the unit--as opposed to one that is too close that "envelops" the unit. That said--I can't get my 44 mag carbine to trigger the unit without the muzzle being very close to the front plane of the unit--the same for most smaller caliber AR15 platforms using conventional suppressors and compensators. My AR 10 builds, however, generally send enough of an impulse back that I have no problems with muzzle being out in front of the unit. I can't say for sure--but I'm guessing the behavior of the sound waves at the muzzle doesn't necessarily match the exhaust blast--but that speculation is way above my pay grade so I would defer to others with real fizziks knowledge.Thanks for that tip.
I was watching some of the videos and it they said to keep the tip of the barrel even with the Labradar if rifle doesn't have a muzzle device. What's your experience? The guy in this video has his Savage 6.5 well in front of the device. I hope that works since my Savage 10T barrel is 24" and is longer than the benches at my range.
Good question--if you're not OCD about load development--you could probably live without it. I am--to a degree anyway, so it's well worth it for me. The tracking spread over a range is very interesting too to me--not just muzzle velocity.Every time I think of replacing my old optical chrony I ask myself, will this help me in my quest for smaller groups or just a fancy toy to impress the boys at the range ? I always decide the money would be better spent on upgrading my guns or reloading equipment.
Good question--if you're not OCD about load development--you could probably live without it. I am--to a degree anyway, so it's well worth it for me. The tracking spread over a range is very interesting too to me--not just muzzle velocity.
Can't argue that--I could use that as well.the best way for me to improve my shooting at the moment is to send as many bullets down range a week as I can.