ArmySon wrote:
I agree 110%, except for if it takes longer than 20 seconds to strip it, you don't know what the h@ll you're doing.
I'm no expert marksman, but I can keep all shots within one foot at 50 yards with my 1911 Springfield, yet I couldn't hit a barn from the INSIDE with a damn glock I tried.
Blue Duck wrote:
THANK GOD, NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Never, ever, ever, use "glock" (Austrian for POS) in the same sentence or thought with 1911.
Rick B wrote:
I tried to see it your way, but I couldn't shove my head that far up my a$$. Not to mention that in this case he doesn't have a clue as to what he's saying.
CSAY's original question:
Just as sane and prudent as its' been for 90 - odd years.
Tim W.
It's the opposite for me, I shoot the 1911 better then any other 'modern' handgun. In addition, it feels the best in my hand.
Field stripping a 1911 for cleaning should only take 1 minute or less
I agree 110%, except for if it takes longer than 20 seconds to strip it, you don't know what the h@ll you're doing.
I'm no expert marksman, but I can keep all shots within one foot at 50 yards with my 1911 Springfield, yet I couldn't hit a barn from the INSIDE with a damn glock I tried.
Blue Duck wrote:
Kinda sounds like a Glock doesn't it.
THANK GOD, NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Never, ever, ever, use "glock" (Austrian for POS) in the same sentence or thought with 1911.
Rick B wrote:
I can't really understand anyone's irrational attraction to the 1911 design, either. If my gun jammed all the time, and was very finicky about magazines, recoil springs, extractor tension, and all the other things that people complain about on their 1911's, it would drive me crazy - and I certainly wouldn't trust my life to a gun like that.
I tried to see it your way, but I couldn't shove my head that far up my a$$. Not to mention that in this case he doesn't have a clue as to what he's saying.
CSAY's original question:
Is this prudent?
Just as sane and prudent as its' been for 90 - odd years.
Tim W.