00-Buck vs Other Loads - Possible Compromise

TEX

New member
Shotgun 00-Buck vs Other Loads - I know it has been discussed here before and the debate may never be settled, but I believe I may have found a workable compromise. It seems to me that adequate penetration has always been the concern. At near point blank range 0-3 meters, I feel there may not be a real difference since the pellets have not had a real chance to separate, but some say no. For real street work with a shot gun, I don’t think 00-Buck can be beat, but the goal was to find something that met two criteria for home defense.

1. Has adequate penetration at close range, but limited penetration on walls and at distance for pellets that missed target. Expected range would be 1-10 meters, 15 meters max.

2. Has manageable recoil. A 3&1/3 inch with 00-Buck can be brutal to the shooter.

An added benefit is that with 2&3/4 inch shells, vs 3&1/2 shells, the gun in question will hold one additional round.

I was originally interested in Hevi-Shot’s Dead Coyote load, which came in a 3&1/2 shell, and was moving fifty 20-caliber, denser than lead, projectiles at about 1300 fps. I figured if you could get more pellets to penetrate as well as 00-Buck, it would be a step up. Good stuff, but kicks real hard. In my opinion this T size heavier than lead pellets would do the job from 1-10 meters that I don’t think 00-Buck would much improve on. I think however, base on the cost of the shells, the heavier than lead pellets must actually be gold – just joking.

I recently ran across a baby brother to this load and it is more reasonably priced. It is labeled as Hevi-Shot Maximum Defense and uses the same heavier than lead T-shot moving at the same velocity. One brochure says 1350-fps and I have seen 1250 and 1300 mentioned. The only difference is that it only has 35 pellets vs 50 pellets.

I think for a home defense shotgun, this may be the best compromise. A heavier than lead 20-caliber pellet moving out at magnum velocity (1300-fps) should give adequate penetration on a goblin, yet missed pellets probably would not make it into the neighbor’s house, etc. Because of the number of pellets, it should be a very dense pattern at close range – Imagine a 7 yard, half foot wide pattern with 35 pellets that penetrated adequately. Pretty much everything within that six inch circle would be pulverized. Recoil is way more manageable and my 870 will hold one more round of this stuff than the 3” S&B I was using before. I may however have this Hevi-Shot as the first three rounds and the rest 3” 00-Buck – haven’t decided. I usually keep slugs in the side saddle. This stuff also holds a smaller pattern at 15 yards than the 00-Buck. I haven’t had a chance to see how many sheets of sheetrock it would go through at 10 yards, but I will test this eventually. It does take steel poppers down rather smartly however. Don’t think the poppers would take well to a steady diet of this stuff and I figure there is a higher chance of bounce back - for those contemplating the same I would suggest you don’t shoot steel with this stuff straight on, only at an angle.

Any thoughts?
 
For self defense I don't think you can beat 3" #4 buck shot. You get 49 balls almost 22 cal in diameter going out at one time. It's like shooting a full box of 22 shells at the perp at once. At home defense ranges (such as you describe) penetration isn't going to be an issue. I don't want to start a debate here or discuss this with anyone, I'm just telling you to look at the ballistics and think about it for a minute. It will give you something to think about.
 
Giving thought to your SD choices is good, but it is possible to over think too.
I use 2/34" 00 buck for SD exclusively...standard bargain priced 00 buck. It is cheap enough to shoot a lot of it, and I know what it will do in my shotgun. I also don't have to wonder what round is coming up on the next pump...it is all the same.
 
I wouldn't consider a 3 1/2. Recoil isn't my friend, especially since my wife may also be using the gun.

I have considered a smaller shot, T, BB, #1, or #2, but these days it's pretty steel or nothing.

One concern is that steel wouldn't deform as much when hitting flesh or walls. Does that lead to over penetration? I don't know. It weighs less so maybe the lighter weight offsets the lack of deformation.
 
I keep my HD shotgun loaded with Federal 2 3/4 in.mag #4 buck. It has 34 .24cal.pellets and I think it should work just fine inside the house without overpenetrating.I also keep oo and slugs in the side carrier for reloads in case the problem goes outside and distance to target becomes an issue.If I could still get the Federal mag.load of #1 buck I would use it instead.I guess I'm just about the only one that liked that load,it's been discontinued for a number of years now.
 
Compromise? That's easy, 2 3/4" shell with any shot #4 or larger. Not trying to knock down a goose at 60 yards but stop a 2 legged boogerman closer than 20 feet or a 4 legged varmint in the yard, maybe 20 yards tops. No use taking any more beating than you have to.
 
In my 870HD shotgun I use Federal LE low recoil tactical buckshot. It's 2 3/4" (don't need anything more), offers maximum capacity of shots, and will help keep you on target for followup shots if needed. For home defense loads, I don't mind spending a little extra on a load that I know has been tested a bit more to pattern better, lessen recoil, and is of higher quality than the standard "cheap" buckshot you'd find in the bargain bin.
 
Since I do not have a short barreled 12ga. I use #3 buck in my 20ga. for dedicated HD weapon.

Do I feel it is up to par with the 00 buck? NOPE!!! But I have practiced for "double tap" at HD distances aiming for C.o.M. in rapid fire. I am then immediately ready for a 3rd shot if needed.

2 3/4 inch is all I use for anything in a shotgun... Never laid in the bottom of a blind wing shooting quackers so I never seen the need for anything over the little shells.

Brent
 
Personally, I think there are much better options than 00 Buck for HD. I like anything ranging from BB to #1 Buck with #4 Buck being my preference. The reason is that these shot sizes offer adequate penetration with a substantially higher pellet count than 00 Buck. With regard to overpenetration, nearly any shotgun shell will overpenetrate if you miss. I've personally seen the result of a AD with a 16ga loaded with #7 Birdshot and it went through multiple walls.
 
00 buck is historically proven as a manstopper. Very very few people survive a round of 00 buck to the torso. There's a reason police use it, the Army uses it, Marines, etc.- it works. I keep my 12 ga loaded with it too.

That said, if I were going to use something other than 00 buck, I'd go with #1 or #4. That's the smallest I'd use though.
 
Wacos, Yer sayin' it wrong... it ain't aught... it is ought, that 'splains why folks look at you funny when you ask for dubble aught...:D
Brent
 
Somewhere 'tween thee and thou and modern speech. "for naught" means "for nothing", "ought" equals zero where naught equals nothing... or there abouts...
Brent
 
Many years ago I read a very comprehensive article on various buckshot in which they used a variety of tests to determine choices - spread, pattern density, penetration, etc at various ranges. The impetus for the article revolved around guides having to chase down client-wounded leopards in brush, and I *think* it may have been a Peter Capstick article. As an aside, they also considered the same data in home defense scenarios.

The upshot was that Number 4 Buck won hands-down. The balls reached the minimal desired penetration at any given range - whatever that was - 8 or 9 inches I think. More importantly, the shot pattern was so dense you were far more likely to hit a vital organ.

00 buck has nine (or eight?) .33 caliber pellets.

#4 Buck has twenty one .24 caliber pellets, so you're putting nearly 2 1/2 times as many pellets out, and all of those pellets have sufficient energy and penetration. The odds are that you're going to get twice as many hits as with the more popular 00 Buck.

I found the argument very convincing.
 
Back
Top