• Anything ‘published’ on the web is viewed as intellectual property and, regardless of whether it displays a copyright symbol or not, is therefore copyrighted by the originator. The only exception to this is if there is a “free and unrestricted reuse” statement associated with the work.

    In order to protect our members and TFL from possible litigation, all members must abide by the following new rules:

    1. Copying and pasting entire articles from another site to TFL is strictly prohibited. The same applies to articles from print or other media, and to posting photographs taken of copyrighted pages or other media.

    2. Copyright law provides for “fair use” of portions of a copyrighted work. You can copy no more than a SINGLE paragraph from the article to your post (3 or 4 sentences at most).

    3. You must provide a link to the article along with the name of website. For example: ww.xxx.yyy/zzz (The Lower Thumbsuck Daily News).

    4. You must provide, in your own words, a brief summary of the article AND your reasons for believing it will be of interest to TFL members. Failure to do so may result in the thread being closed or your post being deleted as a “cut and paste drive by.”

    5. Photographs and other images are also copyrighted. "Hotlinking" of images (so that it appears in your message) from other sites is also prohibited unless you own rights to the image. If you wish to share an image, provide a clickable link to it.

    Posts that do not follow these new guidelines will be altered or deleted by staff. Members who continue to violate this policy may lose their posting privileges at TFL.

    Thank you for your cooperation and your participation in TFL, the leading online forum for firearms enthusiasts.

Zombie threads

Should penalties be levied for resurrecting old, inactive threads?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 20.0%

  • No

    Votes: 4 80.0%
  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JimmyR

New member
I keep seeing people commenting on threads that are years old, and just tonight one that was 13 years old. I know there is the little check box that tells people they are replying to an old thread, but it doesn't seem to stop anybody.

I propose a change to the rules of the forum, stipulating that commenting on a thread that qualifies as inactive (perhaps more than 1 year old) without adding new information should be subject to penalties ranging from an infraction to a 30 day suspension, at the mods discretion. I think adding penalties will help keep the clutter down and make the mods job easier.
 
The problem is that newbies start reading stuff (perhaps found on a search) and don't know what they are doing. The penealy wouldn't help. What we need is a forum software solution that required a certain action to deliberately post to an old thread.

For the "recently dead" threads, I'd like a pop-up that told the user he was responding to an old thread (and give the rules) and he'd have to click YES to continue. For "really dead" threads, I'd have them locked so that the responder would have to request a mod to unlock them in order to add something new.
 
JimmyR said:
...commenting on a thread that qualifies as inactive (perhaps more than 1 year old) without adding new information should be subject to penalties ranging from an infraction to a 30 day suspension, at the mods discretion. I think adding penalties will help keep the clutter down and make the mods job easier.
Click to expand...
Actually, I don't think it would keep the clutter down. As Doyle notes, it's almost entirely a new-member thing, and people don't necessarily memorize the rules when they join. In fact, it would probably make our job just a bit harder, in that we'd have to issue infractions in addition to closing the threads. And I'm not fond of issuing infractions to new members just because they did something dumb.

As to whether the pop-up warning is effective -- things might be much worse without it.

But we do appreciate it when members report necro-threads. :)
 
We're constantly telling people to use the search box before starting a new thread. And then when they do and reply to an old one, they get yelled at for that. What do you want?
 
It's a double edged sword. Some people complain when the same question is asked over and over. When a member uses the search function they may bring up an old thread and still need a bit of clarification after reading through it. So why not keep all the information under the same thread titile instead of starting a new one?

There have been times when I remedy a situation I asked about in an old thread that I started a while ago. I usually post how and what the fix was and thank those who gave advice or information.


Hitting new members with infractions only discourages them from being active in discussions and leaving TFL.
 
I am a moderator on a pipe smoking forum. There is an "Newbie, Ask The Old Farts" section. The rules are simple. Any question is allowed. OFs are not allowed to either give irrelevant answers or tell the newbie to use search. At least it might reduce the "clutter".

Personally, I am pleased so see some zombie threads revived. It tells me someone is searching for more information. And new members serve to keep the forum vital and refreshed.

Just my 2 cents.
 
I will admit to being a little irritated a few times after reading a couple of pages and realizing the thread is from 2010. However, I’ve learned if a thread has multiple pages the first thing I do is check the date of the OP before reading very much. I may skip to the most recent post and see if it’s interesting if not I simply move on. Occasionally an old thread will be restarted with new information, but at the end of the day it’s up to each person to decide what’s interesting to them.
 
Sorry, but we don't make changes to the board's policies based on polls. Though some may wish it to be, TFL isn't a democracy.

Is resurrecting an old thread really that big of a problem? As several here have stated, we sometimes chastise new members (and some old ones) when they don't do a search and ask an old, perhaps tiresome, question. Yet when they do the search, the odds are fairly good that the thread they find on the subject they are interested in is over a year old.

There are several courses of action to take when you spot a "zombie" thread:
a) Ignore it and move on.
b) Post in it with any new information you may have for the member.
c) Report it to the moderators so that it can be closed if the resurrecting post is of no value, and the thread should never have been brought back up.

Please note that ridiculing the member in the thread is not one of the above choices. It never is a good choice for anything here.
 
Doyle said:
For the "recently dead" threads, I'd like a pop-up that told the user he was responding to an old thread (and give the rules) and he'd have to click YES to continue. For "really dead" threads, I'd have them locked so that the responder would have to request a mod to unlock them in order to add something new.
Click to expand...

We already have that, it looks like this:

attachment.php


The trouble is, any good solution requires that threads are able to be resurrected for good cause and not for poor cause. The only such solution requires that the person doing the resurrecting has a modicum of common sense.

For all intents and purposes, someone who clicks a box that effectively says "I understand that this person asked about which rifle he should buy 14 years ago but I'd like to still offer an opinion." is not going to be dissuaded by another level of bureaucracy.
 

Attachments

  • OldThread.JPG
    OldThread.JPG
    25.6 KB · Views: 128
Brian, that is the pop-up I'd use for a "recently dead" thread. Anything dead over a longer period of time (I'd vote for one year) would require a mod to unlock.
 
The software does not allow for locking threads older than a predetermined length of time. It would have be done manually, and we aren't going to do that.
 
What is the problem with history?
Zombie threads seem like a non issue.
Complaining about them seems to me like one is just looking for something to complain about.
:)
 
Doyle said:
Anything dead over a longer period of time (I'd vote for one year) would require a mod to unlock.
Click to expand...

Understood. I think the general consensus is that it's really a non-issue. Resurrection of threads for no good reason really isn't a major problem. It's not like trying to stop people from posting dirty pictures or something.

It's not much worse than people bringing up the same suggestions over and over again in Site Questions, like auto-locking old threads.:D;)
 
Vanya said:
Actually, I don't think it would keep the clutter down. As Doyle notes, it's almost entirely a new-member thing, and people don't necessarily memorize the rules when they join. In fact, it would probably make our job just a bit harder, in that we'd have to issue infractions in addition to closing the threads. And I'm not fond of issuing infractions to new members just because they did something dumb.

As to whether the pop-up warning is effective -- things might be much worse without it.

But we do appreciate it when members report necro-threads.
Click to expand...

I really don't like the idea of infractions either, but I guess I was having a hard time thinking of a better solution. As mods have told me in the past, a basic infraction isn't a big deal, but it does help keep you from breaking rules repeatedly, and being more thoughtful with your posting. Perhaps making the "old thread" notification more prominent would be one solution, but I was trying to think of things that could be somewhat easily implemented.

zxcvbob said:
We're constantly telling people to use the search box before starting a new thread. And then when they do and reply to an old one, they get yelled at for that. What do you want?
Click to expand...

When a 3 year old post is resurrected, let's add new information, either in changes to an active court case, recall, legislative push, or range report on an intended purchase. Just add something relevant.

Mal H said:
Sorry, but we don't make changes to the board's policies based on polls. Though some may wish it to be, TFL isn't a democracy.
Click to expand...

I understand, and such was not my intent. I was wondering if I was the only one who felt that way, and based on the poll, I guess I am.

From all appearances, it's just a me thing. My apologies to any who I may have unintentionally offended. Mods, feel free to close this.
 
Truly, it's not that big of a problem.

Sometimes bringing a zombie thread back to life is appropriate, sometimes not.

If you find a zombie post that should have stayed dead, simply click the Report Post button and go on your merry way. A member of staff will look at it and determine what needs to be done with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top