You're a restaurant owner with a gun on you

old_yout

New member
Let's say that you own a restaurant, it's the end of the night. You're about to lock up, you have your hand on your 642, or some such similar sized gun, in your pocket and somebody storms into the restaurant. He has a gun pointed at you and demands the money out of the register. What do you do?
Now let's say it's the same situation, but it's an hour earlier and there are still a couple of customers left. How differently would you react?
 
I think under the circumstances, since he's got the drop on me I would give up the money. Of course it would also depend on the robber. If he was a cool customer and I felt that all he wanted was the money and that there wouldn't be trouble if I give it up, I would. Course if the guy was hopped up or acting crazy it would change my assesment of the situation. Remember that at best it's a 50 /50 chance against another guy with a gun. I would even be less likely to try anything if there were other people in the place. It all depends on how it goes down. There are a lotta things to take into consideration. I should also mention that if the guy has the drop on you, your odds diminish of getting out of the situation in one piece if you chooses to try and make the play. This is just how I see it from what you've given me to work with. As the saying goes. Cool heads prevail. Just my .02 on the scenario.

------------------
***Torpedo***
It's a good life if you can survive it!
 
I like what torpedo says, but I need to know some more details. For example, am I behind the bar (lots of potential protection and also concealment as I get my piece) or am I full exposed and a only a foot or two from the felon?

Two things are certain: (a) I intend to live to see tomorrow and (b) if there's any possible way, my uninvited visitor's view of tomorrow will be from a jail cell, a hospital bed, or another world -- I'm going to nail the SOB if I can.
 
Yeah, kill them all let God sort them out.

In light of the continued pressure on responsible gun owners why do we continue to openly discuss hero fantasies regarding the immediate dispatching of pistol wielding bad guys? Just thought I would ask.
 
Well, because we don't consider them hero fantasies. Ron, should we take that to mean that you believe that the "pressure" you mentioned would somehow be lessened if we didn't discuss whether to attempt a shot on an armed robber?

No flames, but if so, I respectfully disagree. The people putting that pressure on are not doing so because they're afraid we'll try to stop a robbery. They want all the guns gone yesterday, and they aren't going to stop short of that.
 
Ron, let me offer another perspective.

Most CCW and other basic firearms training today includes some discussion of situational awareness ... often presented in Col. Coopers' color code system. As part of this discussion, it is often mentioned that considering different self defense scenarios, and your best reaction to them, is one of the most important things you can do to enhance the success of your self defense response. Certainly training and practice are critical, but it is also important to consider 'what ifs' in your training.

This isn't unlike athletes that imagine themselves performing their various sports. Just as we practice to develop muscle memory, this is rather like the development of wise decision memory.

I've always felt that I have benefited from such discussions. Many LEO's participate in these threads, as well as other well-experienced folks on TFL that share their knowledge and experience.

So, please reconsider your perspective on this discussion. Sure, some folks may seem a bit more action-oriented than they should be ... but, that is the benefit of such a thread. This gives us a chance to compare notes, and quite often conclude 'No, there is too much risk to ourselves and innocent others in such a case.' Or, if the BG threatens to kill and fires a round, then we'd likely conclude 'that is the time we must take action to save innocent life.'

For me, this is one of the great benefits from TFL.

Regards from AZ
 
Ron,
The simple facts in this scenario are clear:
> The felon enters a restaurant to commit armed robbery.
> In addition, by aiming a firearm at the owner, he causes immediate and grave danger to innocent life.
Therefore, it seems obvious the BG invites any harm inflicted by his criminal behavior.

Jeff,
With respect, I hope you are not referring to me when you state: "some folks may seem a bit more action-oriented than they should be" (although I do appreciate the finesse with which this was phrased).

I have always attempted to be reasonable and judicious in my TFL postings, both in tone and in content. However, my tolerance for felonious behavior -- particularly crimes of violence -- is low. Accordingly, if someone threatens innocent life, I will try to protect others and myself (certainly within the bounds of safety and sound judgment). Do you find this unwarranted or unwise?


[This message has been edited by RWK (edited September 09, 2000).]
 
Ok, open mouth insert foot. Think twice post once...

RWK:

What I read into your post was that you were going to shoot the guy come hell or high water whether it endangered other folks or not. Sorry about that.

You guys sure did a good job of fielding my comment without being abrasive or compromising your belief system. Have to admire that.

Jeff:

Position reconsidered. You are right on the money. Sorry I blew up.
 
That's a good question...

------------------
"Get rid of that nickel plated sissy pistol and get yourself a Glock" - Tommy Lee Jones
 
Remember, thats YOUR restaurant, and YOUR money. Its not some corporate entities money, and its loss may mean your kids go hungry. Tough call, but I would not care to give up my hard earned dough as easily as I would someones elses. If it is feasible, I would make him dead.
 
I might suggest that one looks into tactical courses that have simunition exercises. Or some ranges have computer generated live fire exercises

I've done this quite a few times and it gives you a perspective beyond discussions or even IDPA were no one shoots back.

Paint ball is unrealistic.

One needs to die a few times, hit an innocent, be helpless as you are truly at gun point from a team to appreciate what's really up.

I've seen good and bad outcomes in this situation several times.

Well worth the money and the major schools do such.
 
RWK, no criticism meant of you. I knew what you meant, and I'm sure you would have said that you would not fire or precipitate any violence if the store was full of people, the BG didn't fire or seem agitated enough to fire, and it looked like he would walk out.

I'm referring to the occasional visitor (this being the 'net and all) who may have a 'kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out' attitude. Very, very rare on TFL, thankfully.

Ron, glad you see our perspective. Thank you.


Regarding the question, the best advice I've seen about the situation above is that you must try and gauge the likelihood of the BG killing you or someone else. Pretty tough.

Action beats reaction. So, if you hand is on your revolver, then, theoretically, you will be able to draw and fire before your assailant. But, that's the first shot or two ... You could miss. If he has a shotgun, you're facing a lot of firepower. (We've seen this in Phoenix lately, in convenience stores ... imagine you're looking down the short barrel of a shotgun. That'll focus the mind.)

If there are customers in the store, it becomes more complicated still. Are they behind the BG? If so, then there is very great danger that you will hurt or kill them if things get ugly. Your best bet then, if absolutely necessary, is to try to drop low and fire up, so that overpenetration and missed shot(s) hit the ceiling. If customers are well off to the side or in the back of the store, then this risk is reduced, but not eliminated.

Someone may correct me, and I don't know the stat's, but most armed robberies end with no shots fired. I think we all owe a moral duty to ourselves, our families and our communities to stop scum like this BG, if legally and morally justifiable. But, we can't do so by foolishly endangering innocent others.

So, it comes down to the location of innocent others, your confidence with your firearm, the look in that scumbag's eyes, and the hairs on the back of your neck, IMHO.

And, I hope none of us ever have to work this difficult calculation.

One last point, about reviewing scenarios like this. Some folks make the correct observation that in a real situation like that above, all these fine points of discussion go out the window ... rather like the fog of war. To a great extent, I'm sure that is true. But, I still think it helps to consider self defense scenarios. For example, I asked my sister what she would do if a BG forced her into a car, and told her to drive him somewhere ... while holding a gun on her. She immediately said she would do 'whatever he tells me to do'. I told her she would die. I advised her to have her seatbelt on, and drive into the nearest hard object, like a bridge abutment or telephone pole ... preferably with the passenger side of the vehicle. And get the he!! out of the car as quickly as possible after impact - she knows the impact is coming and the BG doesn't. Traveling to a secondary crime scene is often the end for victims. There is no question in my mind that my sister and wife would take similar action now, but only because they've heard it from me and others. I strongly believe there is value to considering these potential incidents before they occur.

Thanks for the exercise.

Regards from AZ
 
Ron,
Have you played board games (checkers,chess?), How about computer games where you must think and use strategy to win the game?...Have you played in sports where you went over plays, over and over again whether it was team or one on one sports?
Well, Ron, we are playing the strategies or plays, if you will,in our minds and sometimes in practice or competition so that the one time, Ron, the one time that you might be called on to save a life, maybe yours, you don't hesitate...you don't screw up, you do it right the first time.
There is no retake, or do overs.
Remember, the BG's only have to do it right once...and they don't play by the rules.
Remember why you chose to carry a gun?
Some of us choose to practice all we can so that we don't come up short should we ever have to use a gun in defense of a life.

Carry yours in good health...and practice, practice, practice. ;) ;) :D
 
Jeff Thomas,
You are so right about victims getting in cars with the BG.
I knew this LEO who patrolled the foothills here in soCal and when he told me how many bodies they find strewn along the road...I really kept reminding the women in my self-defense class not to just give in and get in the car with the BG.
The LEO said the forest service people find about 17-23 people a year who were left alongside the mountain roads or in the forests...and this is only the ones that they find in Southern California.

Stay safe and keep up the good fight.
 
This is why I love this forum. Great, well thought out replies and civility to boot. Well, you've given a lot to think about. Thanks
 
I have been around guns all my life. I am familiar with their feel and operation. Anyone who has a gun with the idea of using it to defend life or property should practice until it is second nature. Two in the chest and the third one in the head. I'm sorry fellows. Any one that comes in my house or property with a gun and has the little sense to point it at me is going to get shot. I'm not going to ask him what his childhood was like or what dire need he is in that would make him do this sort of foolish thing. I have my CCP and I feel a responsibility to be able to use my gun efficiently without hesitation. Along with my other practice at the range I practice with my 45acp Kimber at about ten feet. I put a 10"x12" square with an 8" circle on top on a piece of card board and practice for speed and accuracy. If I could not become proficient with this practice (three shot in a second), I would quit carrying the gun. Hesitation will kill you. The only thing that would keep me from shooting the BG in this story is if people were standing behind him.. I don't feel anyone should have a gun to use in defense that is not totally proficient with it. This is the reason when people (women) as me what kind of gun to get for protection they don't get an answer. If they have to ask, they are not likely to become proficient. People who buy a handgun especially and never shoot it but a few shots when it is new are dangerous to themselves and others. I agree with Jeff and LASur5r. Pratice and no hesitation. I will go back and sit on the porch now...Mike P.
 
Back
Top