I consider myself to be pretty tolerant.
Even if some clown decides he needs to rapid-fire an entire clip from his AR or AK next to my ear, well, that's part of shooting at a public range.
But, I'm torn over this one...
Yesterday there's a .50 a few benches down from me, and next to where one of my sons was assigned a bench (crowded day..). Now, I've been on the line when a .50 was fired before (different range), and it was further away, and only a few rounds were let loose.
This was a bit different, both in terms of proximity, and number of rounds fired (probably 25 or 30). It goes without saying that the brake accounts for the nastiness to nearby shooters, but since the .50 needs one to be shoulder-fired doing without ain't an option. I dealt with the blast/concussion from a few benches down, but my son opted to sit out while this guy was sending rounds. For those of you that haven't experienced being on the receiving end of the .50 blast from a few feet to the side- well, you have no idea...
The .50 is just in a class by itself...and I understand the "cool" factor, and would probably own one for the hell of it if I had a few grand lying around with nothing to spend it on...
Unless you're trying to stop a tank, the .50 has nothing on the .338 LM ballistically, the .338 is much kinder on the shooter- and more importantly- those that are forced to be in proximity to him...So why wouldn't a serious long range shooter opt for the .338 LM?
Am I being an azz by thinking that .50's should be barred? EDIT TO CLARIFY- I MEAN AT A PUBLIC RANGE...
Even if some clown decides he needs to rapid-fire an entire clip from his AR or AK next to my ear, well, that's part of shooting at a public range.
But, I'm torn over this one...
Yesterday there's a .50 a few benches down from me, and next to where one of my sons was assigned a bench (crowded day..). Now, I've been on the line when a .50 was fired before (different range), and it was further away, and only a few rounds were let loose.
This was a bit different, both in terms of proximity, and number of rounds fired (probably 25 or 30). It goes without saying that the brake accounts for the nastiness to nearby shooters, but since the .50 needs one to be shoulder-fired doing without ain't an option. I dealt with the blast/concussion from a few benches down, but my son opted to sit out while this guy was sending rounds. For those of you that haven't experienced being on the receiving end of the .50 blast from a few feet to the side- well, you have no idea...
The .50 is just in a class by itself...and I understand the "cool" factor, and would probably own one for the hell of it if I had a few grand lying around with nothing to spend it on...
Unless you're trying to stop a tank, the .50 has nothing on the .338 LM ballistically, the .338 is much kinder on the shooter- and more importantly- those that are forced to be in proximity to him...So why wouldn't a serious long range shooter opt for the .338 LM?
Am I being an azz by thinking that .50's should be barred? EDIT TO CLARIFY- I MEAN AT A PUBLIC RANGE...
Last edited: