Ok, here's the situation. I am looking at getting either a HK G3 Centurian Clone from J&G or a SAR1 from AIM.
The Centurian is on a Century receiver with refinished and new parts. It is a stamped steel receiver without the dovetail mount like some of their other ones. They are asking $629 for it.
The SAR1 from AIM is $289 with a 10rd and 30rd mag.
My main dilemma is that I would like both of these rifles. I know the sar's aren't anything pretty to look at but they work great for the most part. I have no Idea what the quality control and functioning is like on the Centurian. I would probably be getting the sar later this summer if I got the centurain. Should I get the Centurian or save some money by getting the sar, a case of ammo, and some mags?
Lets hear it.
The Centurian is on a Century receiver with refinished and new parts. It is a stamped steel receiver without the dovetail mount like some of their other ones. They are asking $629 for it.
The SAR1 from AIM is $289 with a 10rd and 30rd mag.
My main dilemma is that I would like both of these rifles. I know the sar's aren't anything pretty to look at but they work great for the most part. I have no Idea what the quality control and functioning is like on the Centurian. I would probably be getting the sar later this summer if I got the centurain. Should I get the Centurian or save some money by getting the sar, a case of ammo, and some mags?
Lets hear it.