You know Bush really sucks when....

NBT

Moderator
Murdoch decides to endorse Hillary Clinton!...
:confused: :eek: :confused:



By BETH FOUHY, Associated Press Writer
Fri May 12, 5:52 PM ET



NEW YORK - Media mogul Rupert Murdoch, whose Fox News Channel and other conservative news outlets have been skewering Hillary Rodham Clinton for years, will host a summer fundraiser for the senator, mystifying some observers and enraging others.

Especially incensed are liberal activists, who for months have decried what's seen as a shift to a right on Clinton's part as the Democrat contemplates a run for president in 2008. They are stunned that she is associating with a man viewed as a cornerstone of the "vast right-wing conspiracy," the term Clinton herself coined.

"Hillary, help us. Who the hell are you?" thundered Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen.

Liberal blogger David Sirota complained: "The brazenness of this move is almost too much to stomach."

Neither Clinton nor Murdoch have had much to say about the fundraiser since it was first reported this week by The Financial Times.

"I think this is about New York. It's about the kind of job that I'm doing as a senator from New York," Clinton said Friday.

Murdoch, for his part, dismissed the event as "no big deal."

"We think that she has been effective on state issues and local issues here in New York," Murdoch said on a News Corp. earnings call.

The Clinton-Murdoch alliance is not entirely new. The two have been moving toward a detente since 2000, when she won her Senate seat after a campaign that included a series of not-so-flattering Clinton headlines in another Murdoch property, the New York Post. The Post even ran a pleading headline, "Don't Run!" before Clinton formally joined the race.

Murdoch also has developed a relationship with former President Clinton, a prime target of criticism from Fox and the New York Post during his presidency. Murdoch participated in a conference of the Clinton Global Initiative last fall, and the former president is scheduled to address a gathering of News Corp. executives in California later this year.

Murdoch, whose $60 billion empire is a major presence in New York, is more shrewd businessman than ideologue, and friendly relations with a powerful New York senator are in his best interest. Murdoch also organized a fundraiser for New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, during his re-election campaign in 2004.

But Clinton's motive for accepting a Murdoch-sponsored fundraiser is not quite as clear. She faces minimal opposition in her Senate race ? something Murdoch acknowledged this week in an interview on Fox News. And with at least $20 million in her campaign account ? a figure that dwarfs that of all her potential rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination ? Clinton doesn't really need the money.

But Maurice Carroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said the arrangement suits Clinton and Murdoch equally well.

"She's reaching out to a guy who's on the right side of the spectrum, and she needs some friends there," Carroll said.

And Murdoch?

"That's simple ? Hillary's going to run for president, and she might win," Carroll said.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060512/ap_on_el_se/clinton_murdoch
 
Murdoch decides to endorse Hillary Clinton!

The fund raiser is not for a presidential run, it is for her Senate re-election, has nothing to do with Bush.

It may be an endorsement for the Senate seat...it is not an endorsement for President.
 
No, you know he sucks when CCN runs a poll asking "Which man would you say was more honest as president?"
President Bush 26%
President Clinton 74%
with 53,000 votes being cast.

Have people forgotton what a lying sack of crap Clinton was? The results are incredible, even for CNN.
 
The media ran a constant Spin defense of Clinton. Even the characterization of his Impeachment as being about a blow job, rather than the actual criminal perjury, helped to sway opinion. Clinton, dontcha know, was just a midunderstood good ol' boy minding an outstanding economy...

Bush, OTOH, is the embodiement of EVUL in every thing he does, presiding over a horrible economy, even though the figures are better than they ever were under Clintoon...

Spin = public perception. The media decides. Just the way it is...

As for Murdoch, remember that these people have no interest in the Constitution or us. One more reason it's so funny to see leftists point at corporate owners and say "SEE! They are conservative!". No, they are out to make money, period. Murdoch sees a payoff here, nothing more or less...
 
"Which man would you say was more honest as president?"
President Bush 26%
President Clinton 74%
with 53,000 votes being cast.

Have people forgotton what a lying sack of crap Clinton was?

Never lose faith in the gullibility and sheer stupidity of The American Sheeple.:barf: :barf: :barf: :barf:
 
I find it interesting that Bush is supported in this thread so vehemently. Then on other threads dealing with IDs and personal privacy, some of the same people complain about liberty being taken away by the current GOP(BUSH).
 
No, you know he sucks when CCN runs a poll asking "Which man would you say was more honest as president?"
President Bush 26%
President Clinton 74%
with 53,000 votes being cast.

And the polls and exit polls had both gore and kerry winning by landslides. Never belive a poll unless you know where the sample set came from. It was probly a phone survey of san fran.:barf:
 
From a former Republican

Bush is an incompetent boob who surrounds himself with ideological/religous extremists and has a nose sooo far up big business' a$$ that the middle class and the environment is gonna be screwed for years to come. His screw ups will be responsible for the Democrats taking back the House and Presidency. Hillary Clinton, Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi can just rely on him to do the heavy lifting to get their party back into power. They'll probably drink a toast to him after the coming elections.

Being a republican used to stand for something good. Less government interfering in our lives, fiscal responsibility and true leadership. Basically Bush and his crew has turned it into everything liberals are despised for... Big government, wasteful deficit/debt spending and an intrusive trampling of our rights with the Homeland Security Act and social engineering only now with the religious right trying to tell us what shows we can watch, music we can listen to and books we can read. This is why I changed parties from Republican to Libertarian. The rest of the world hates us to the point that crackpots like Venezuela's Chavez can take political pot shots at us and the rest of the world cheers, not too mention the how we'll have all sorts of problems trying to get international support for dealing with the real threat that is Iran and North Korea. China couldn't have picked a better politician to make them the world power. I'm starting to rant now but that's what this boob does to me.
 
For what it is worth, I agree with sig226man. The damage Bush has done to our country is enormous. I will not vote Republican in 2006 or 2oo8. I'm tried of RINO'S running the Republican party.
 
Back
Top