Would you use these scope bases?

Fusion

New member
So I've got a rifle that has these Weaver style aluminum scope bases on it. The problem is while the previous owner had it, one of the rings was missing the nut to screw it tight and the screw wore into the base fairly deep. Now I've got a set of Burris rings I want to use, and wanted to use these bases temporarily. I've used them before in good shape and had decent luck with them so was going to try to again. If my plans work out with this rifle I will need to change to a canted base later on, but right now I need a regular base. I hate to spend $80-100 on a good base right now, only to toss it and have to buy another one in 3 months. So I'd like something to use in the meantime. I'm debating if I should just use these or if I should buy a $15 Weaver base that will be identical without these marks.

Now, when I put the rings on there, they seem to clamp down tight, but it's obviously hard to tell how they will do under recoil. The chewed up part only seems to affect the channel the cross bolt sits in at the very end. The ring also goes slightly past the chewed up part.

Here are a few pictures of what the base looks like.

20130428_011748_zpseac95f04.jpg

20130428_011759_zpsbaf6ff7f.jpg


Do you all think these will be fine to run, or should I shell out $15 for a new set that will be nearly identical? I just wanted to get a general opinion on this. The cut does go fairly deep, but the ring still seems to clamp around it.
 
IMO, The slot looks like the forward edge got battered by the crossbolt hitting it under recoil.

For a short-term use, I'd just rotate that base 180-degrees & re-install it.

FWIW, When installing a scope, using Weaver-type bases, I always install the lower ring halves first/alone, biasing them in either compression towards each other in their somewhat sloppy cross-slots, or in opposition, so there's no way the rinrs will move on the bases(s) once the scope's dropped in, plumbed, slid back/forth for correct eye relief & clamped down (after first checking ring alignment).

YMMV...........:)




.
 
I can't tell from the photo if there is any bulging outside the original dimensions; if so, a file or stone will fix that. Otherwise? It's not hurt enough to care about.
 
Replace it, contact blount of

ID of the STEEL bases.

Is this a magnum? The rings should be tight against the front of the slot.
 
Replace

For what these cost and if you have the slightest reservation in using them, then go with a replacement set. Even though these may still be serviceable, you will still question their performance. .... ;)

Be Safe !!!
 
What Art said.

Low spots are not going to hurt .When metal gets dinged,it upsets and makes high spots.

High spots prevent the precise surfaces from mating together.

Dress off the high spots,but do not file the black off the nearby surfaces.
 
Me personally, I would replace them. I usually pay a lot for my bases (Near or Badger). It is important to me, to some not as much. I am a little OCD about little things like scope bases or rings...
 
The way I read the OP,he has a long term plan to buy better bases but $80 is inconvenient right now,and he asks if these will do short term.

IMO,the Weaver type Leupold PRW's are clean,robust,and a good value.

But I believe,dressed,those bases will serve for now.
 
If you're getting "good ones" in a few months I'd clean them up a use them. Test them at the range. If there's no issues, you're good to go.

Boomer
 
Thanks guys. Yes, my plan is for them to be temporary. I've got plans to change the barrel and stock on this rifle and at the time mount a nice set of rings and bases. I'm looking at Seekins, Badger, or TPS. I've already got a nice scope for it.

However, while I research what barrel I want. I want to just shoot it in stock form. Since I don't have any of the other parts other than the scope for it, I was just going to throw a cheap Simmons on there in a set of Burris rings I had laying around and shoot it in the stock form. That's what I was hoping to use these bases for.
 
Back
Top