WorldNetDaily Exclusive - US child mirder rate soars

STORY

Friday, March 31, 2000


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS
U.S. child murder rate soars
Firearms least of factors, says new research

by Jon E. Dougherty


A new statistical analysis report shows that despite a child-homicide rate in the United States which surpasses that of most other Western nations, firearms are near the bottom of the list of causes for the alarming statistics.
According to a report drafted by Iain Murray, a senior research analyst at the Statistical Assessment Service, a Washington-based non-profit, non-partisan think tank, "in the rush to reduce America's high juvenile homicide rates into a gun-control debate, we're missing the chilling bigger picture of the real and deadly risks our children face, and what it says about our society."

The most recent statistical data available on child homicide rates, Murray said, indicated that the U.S. had the highest infant-child homicide rate -- four times as high -- as all other Western nations surveyed, at 4.1 children per 100,000 people.

But "for every American child 4 or younger" that is murdered, he said, "more than eight others die violently by other means -- blunt objects, strangulation or, most commonly, hands, fists or feet."

Even in the 5-14 age group, he said, the U.S. non-gun murder rate is more than double the rates taken from the international sampling group, "although the rate of murders by firearms does increase considerably as children get older."

One of the most recent high-profile child murder cases involving a gun was the shooting death of six-year-old Kayla Rolland, who was killed by a classmate in a Michigan school last month. As expected, the incident sparked more calls for childproofing handguns -- such as adding trigger locks -- from traditional gun control advocates and from the Clinton administration.

Some experts have said the Rolland case may even have been the impetus for Smith & Wesson, one of the nation's largest handgun makers, to strike a deal with the administration that would prevent the company from being sued by municipalities and the Justice Department, who say gun makers shoulder responsibility for illegal acts committed with guns they manufacture. Specifically, Smith & Wesson executives agreed to add trigger locks to all handguns sold by the company, and to forbid shipment of their handguns to dealers who would not agree to the company's new childproof packaging mandates.

But Murray said the statistics don't measure up to the hype.

"While the rate of child gun homicide in the U.S. is much higher than elsewhere -- as everyone acknowledges -- so is the rate of non-gun murder," he said. "Even if all the gun homicides were taken out of the equation, America would still have an infant-homicide rate more than 3.5 times as high as the other Western countries," a phenomenon he called "staggering."

America's obsession with guns and gun violence, Murray said, is understandable, but that obsession is "blinding us to another significant social problem," noting that in 1997 alone, 738 children under the age of 13 were murdered across the country (but only 133 by guns, according to the FBI).

"America is witnessing something barbaric happening to its young children," Murray said, noting that the figures might be unbelievable had they not been tallied by official U.S. government sources.

He said the case of another child, 23-month-old Brianna Blackmond, "is more typical of the young children killed in this country." She died in January from a blow to the head given to her by her mother after being returned from a foster home.

"But how much press attention did that death receive outside Washington, compared with Kayla Rolland's tragic but unusual death?" Murray asked.

It is also important to note, he said, "that the main thrust of the 'Kids and Guns' study" -- a recent government report -- "is that the rise and subsequent fall in the murder rate among older juveniles in the 1990s was driven by firearm murders and the consequent gun-control measures. ... But this does not apply to murders of children aged 13 or younger."

Murray said the murder rate in that group was 1.8 per 100,000 in 1976 and 1.7 in 1997, "never having risen above 2.1 in the intervening 20 years."

"Children under 13 are being killed just about as often now as they were during the height of the crack-fueled murder boom of the early 1990s," said the STATS researcher. "If anything has been done to combat the problem, it hasn't worked," which, ostensibly, includes a number of new gun-control laws that have been passed over the last 20 years.

Yet the data show something surprising: 85 percent of U.S. counties reported no child homicides -- by any cause -- in 1997, while just 7 percent experienced two or more.

"In great swaths of the country, child murder is virtually unknown," Murray said. "The problem is confined mainly to the big cities of the East and West coasts, and to the Southwest."

The research analyst also questioned the wisdom of universal gun laws emanating from the federal level. Though gun violence in otherwise peaceful suburban communities seems to garner headlines, "the overwhelming majority of child murders happen elsewhere. This fact alone would imply that across-the-board federal solutions affecting the entire country may be misplaced," he said.

Though it would seem more sensible to use government resources to "concentrate where the problem is the greatest," Murray added that other feel-good measures, such as having "pediatricians nationwide ... talk to all young children about guns," as some national pediatric groups have proposed, "is well-intentioned, but will achieve little."

"By letting ourselves believe that guns are the problem for pre-adolescents, we are avoiding the unpalatable truth that something is very wrong in American society," Murray said. "We focus on exceptional cases, and ignore the unsettling nature of the daily reality."

But, he said, there may be "a lesson here."

"We may be able to reduce child-murder rates to the levels of other countries if we concentrate on what causes those murders -- and guns aren't the biggest factor."

There may be a hidden "domino effect," he said, that causes children who live in unstable or dangerous environments "where their lives have little value" to also regard the lives of others in the same light "when they are seduced by the power of the gun." Breaking that cycle and making childhood safer and saving the lives of the youngest children may help save older children down the road, Murray said.

"Perhaps the safety locks we most need are the ones that other civilized countries place in their citizens' consciences," he said. While the tragic deaths of the "Kayla Rollands are thankfully the exception rather than the rule ... it is the Brianna Blackmonds who really deserve the attention of the nation's doctors and the president."



------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

Vote for the Neal Knox 13

[This message has been edited by Slowpoke_Rodrigo (edited March 31, 2000).]
 
I'm sorry, that should be 'murder' not 'mirder' in the topic title.

It is a pity that our socialist enemies have co-opted the phrase 'for the children.'

What sort of human beats, clubs or strangles an innocent child to death? A savage or barbarian, one that is uncivilized. What is civil law to the uncivilized? Nothing.

------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

Vote for the Neal Knox 13

[This message has been edited by Slowpoke_Rodrigo (edited March 31, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Slowpoke_Rodrigo (edited March 31, 2000).]
 
That is a point that our side ought to be screaming. That by focusing on the guns, these politicians are ignoring the real problem and thus allowing these needless deaths.

As to the Mayors of these large cities with all the children deaths, it's interesting to note they are the same one's blaming the gun manufacturers. It would seem to me that they as Mayor have more control over these deaths than do the gun manufacturers. It's a point someone needs to bring up.



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
But "for every American child 4 or younger" that is murdered, he said, "more than eight others die violently by other means -- blunt objects, strangulation or, most commonly, hands, fists or feet."
[/quote]

WHo is is confused by this phrase?
 
Here is a link to Murray's report, referred to in the WorldNetDaily story.

I conclude that Murray means to say that, in the United States, for every child homicide by firearm, more than eight other chidren are homicides by other methods.

------------------
Slowpoke Rodrigo...he pack a gon...

Vote for the Neal Knox 13

[This message has been edited by Slowpoke_Rodrigo (edited March 31, 2000).]
 
There are no statistics available for the number of children 14 and under who are injured by guns, but estimates hover around the 1200 per year mark. In the course of doing research for another subject, I found that over 23,000 children under age 14 are injured each year by power tools, power saws and small electrical kitchen appliances.

Where's that graphic on the TV news of a big circle saw when they talk about "the children?"

Dick
 
Back
Top